The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
-
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · May 1992
Optimal delivery of cardioplegic solution for "redo" operations.
Increasing experience suggests that retrograde cardioplegia offers several benefits during cardiac reoperations. However, the need for dissection to allow caval snares for open coronary sinus intubation or to palpate the atrioventricular groove for transatrial coronary sinus intubation may disturb diseased vein grafts or require more dissection than necessary. Although antegrade-retrograde techniques can be used, antegrade cardioplegia risks atheromatous embolization from old vein grafts. ⋯ There were two (3%) deaths, both from hospital-acquired pneumonia, no perioperative myocardial infarctions, and no episodes of heart block. Inotropic agents were used in six of 63 patients (10%). We conclude that "no touch" transatrial retrograde cardioplegia offers optimal, simplified myocardial protection for cardiac reoperations, permits arrest of the heart before cardiac manipulations, and expands the use of retrograde cardioplegia by obviating cardiac dissection.
-
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · May 1992
Efficacy, complications, and cost of a comprehensive blood conservation program for cardiac operations.
We reviewed blood use in 118 consecutive patients who underwent primary, elective cardiac operations in 1989. In June 1989 we initiated a blood conservation program that included attempts to limit preoperative aspirin use, intraoperative phlebotomy and hemodilution, use of a cell conservation device (Electromedics, Inc., Englewood, Colo.) to concentrate residual oxygenator contents, reinfusion of chest drainage, and acceptance of a minimum hemoglobin level of 8.0 gm/dl in stable patients. Patient characteristics were similar for patients operated on both before (n = 58) and after (n = 60) initiation of the blood conservation program, except for age and preoperative aspirin use (both greater in postconservation patients). ⋯ Chest tube drainage, postoperative hematologic parameters, and the prevalence of complications were not significantly different between groups. Stepwise linear regression analysis identified intraoperative withdrawal of blood before cardiopulmonary bypass, bypass duration, and preoperative hematocrit value as predictors of blood use. Intraoperative withdrawal of blood before cardiopulmonary bypass is an important conservation measure, and its use should be expanded.
-
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · May 1992
Comparative StudyComparison of ischemic vulnerability and responsiveness to cardioplegic protection in crystalloid-perfused versus blood-perfused hearts.
The possibility of differences between crystalloid-perfused and blood-perfused hearts in their vulnerability to ischemia and responsiveness to protective interventions has been investigated in isolated rabbit hearts perfused with bicarbonate buffer or arterial blood. In preliminary studies with 165 minutes of aerobic perfusion at constant perfusion pressure (55 +/- 3 mm Hg), the stability of left ventricular developed pressure was significantly better in blood-perfused hearts. In subsequent studies, hearts were subjected to 20 minutes of aerobic perfusion (coronary flow, 2.0 +/- 0.3 ml/min/gm wet weight in blood-perfused hearts versus 11.3 +/- 3.0 ml/min/gm wet weight in crystalloid-perfused hearts; left ventricular developed pressure, 90 +/- 4 and 91 +/- 2 mm Hg, respectively) followed by 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, or 105 minutes of normothermic global ischemia and 40 minutes of reperfusion (n = 4 per group). ⋯ After 60 minutes of reperfusion, the postischemic recoveries of left ventricular developed pressure in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 32% +/- 3%, 44% +/- 4%, 43% +/- 7%, and 72% +/- 6%, respectively, with coronary flow recovering to 64% +/- 7%, 82% +/- 4%, 82% +/- 4%, and 110% +/- 5%, respectively. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressures were 20 +/- 5, 24 +/- 7, 15 +/- 4, and 4 +/- 3 mm Hg, and tissue water contents were 4.76 +/- 0.11, 4.87 +/- 0.55, 3.93 +/- 0.05, and 3.68 +/- 0.02 ml/gm dry weight, respectively. In conclusion, compared with crystalloid perfusion, the blood-perfused rabbit heart has a greater resistance to ischemia, a superior response to cardioplegic protection, and a lower tissue water content.