Progress in cardiovascular diseases
-
Prog Cardiovasc Dis · Mar 2016
Review Meta AnalysisWhich Aspirin Dose and Preparation Is Best for the Long-Term Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer? Evidence From a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
The evidence base on aspirin in primary prevention suggests that it can reduce significantly the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and cancer, especially colorectal, albeit increasing bleeding. There is, however, uncertainty on the optimal aspirin dose and preparation for primary prevention. We thus aimed to review main sources of evidence informing on daily dosage and preparation of aspirin for primary prevention of CVD and cancer. ⋯ An average daily dose of 100mg had the highest probability of reducing death, cancer death, and cancer incidence, whereas higher doses seemed superior for reducing CVD events, and 100mg or less daily proved better tolerated. Coated preparations appeared more beneficial for death, cancer death, cancer incidence, and GI bleeding, whereas controlled release preparations appeared better for CVD events and non-coated ones for intracranial bleeding. In conclusion, an average daily dose of 100mg of coated aspirin seems more likely to confer favorable preventive effects on death and cancer, with higher doses more appealing for CVD prevention and lower doses better tolerated.
-
Prog Cardiovasc Dis · Mar 2016
Review Meta AnalysisRisk of Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Long-Term Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Treatment.
The relative cardiovascular (CV) safety of oral anticoagulants continues to be debated, and in particular concerns for risk of myocardial infarction (MI) have been raised. We analyzed the risk of MI in patients treated long term with oral anticoagulants (vitamin K antagonists [VKA], direct thrombin inhibitors or activated X factor antagonist) for atrial fibrillation, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism using a network meta-analysis (NMA). ⋯ There is a considerable heterogeneity regarding CV safety among oral anticoagulants. Differences in risk of MI may influence the choice of treatment. Multiple treatment NMA found 29%-44% higher odds of MI with dabigatran supporting the concerns regarding its CV safety.
-
Prog Cardiovasc Dis · Mar 2016
ReviewThe Divergent Cardiovascular Effects of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers on Myocardial Infarction and Death.
The renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) plays a central role in the pathophysiology of hypertension and vascular disease. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) suppress angiotensin II (ANG II) concentrations, whereas angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) block the binding of ANG II to AT1 receptors. ACEis and ARBs are both effective anti-hypertensive agents and have similar risk reductions in stroke - a blood pressure dependent phenomenon. ⋯ Systematic reviews of ARBs that include meta-analyses or meta-regression analyses confirm that ARBs lack the cardiovascular protective effects of ACEis, which in part are "independent" of blood pressure lowering. Practice guidelines, especially those in high risk hypertensive patients, should reflect the evidence that ACEis and ARBs have divergent cardiovascular effects - ACEis reduce mortality, whereas ARBs do not. ACEis should be the preferred RAAS inhibitor in high risk patients.