Crit Care Resusc
-
Objective: To describe the prevalence of common and clinically relevant microbial isolates before and after the migration of a 24-bed, open plan, adult intensive care unit (ICU) to a new extended design of 32 single rooms, supporting an expanded clinical oncology casemix while continuing all existing clinical services. Design: Retrospective, observational descriptive analysis covering the period 5 May 2014 to 4 May 2018 - the 2 years before and after the ICU relocation on 5 May 2016. Setting: A university-associated, tertiary teaching hospital and state trauma centre in Victoria, Australia. ⋯ The incidence rates per 1000 occupied bed-days between ICU locations were unchanged for Staphylococcus aureus (IRR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.91-1.3), extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing organisms (IRR, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.78-2.6) and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (IRR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.11-6.4). Conclusion: Within the limits of a before-after design and clinically directed sampling, relocation to a new ICU with single rooms and a growing oncological patient casemix was accompanied by no overall change in the apparent prevalence of the nosocomial pathogens S. aureus, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing organisms or carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales. These finding suggest that advanced physical infrastructure, including patient accommodation in single rooms, may play a role in overall safe delivery of critical care.
-
Objective: To describe the pattern of acute illness and 6-month mortality and health-related quality-of-life outcomes for a cohort of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients presenting with septic shock. Design: Nested cohort study of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander participants recruited to a large randomised controlled trial of corticosteroid treatment in patients with septic shock. Setting: Royal Darwin Hospital, Northern Territory. ⋯ When compared with the matched population drawn from the broader ADRENAL cohort, there was no significant difference in 90-day mortality (12/60 v 16/61; adjusted odds ratio, 1.43 [95% CI, 0.60 to 3.39]; P = 0.42). Only nine Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients provided 6-month health-related quality-of-life data. Conclusions: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients had reduced risk of death at 90 days when compared with non- Indigenous patients recruited to the ADRENAL trial at Royal Darwin Hospital, which was robust to adjustment for covariates, but similar outcomes when compared with a cohort matched for age, sex and severity of disease.
-
The College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand is responsible for credentialling trainees for specialist practice in intensive care medicine for the safety of patients and the community. This involves defining trainees' performance standards and testing trainees against those standards to ensure safe practice. The second part examination performed towards the end of the training program is a high-stakes assessment. ⋯ There is increasing expectation for medical specialist training colleges to provide fair and transparent assessment processes to enable defensible decisions regarding trainee progression. Examinations are a surrogate marker of clinical performance with advantages, disadvantages and inevitable compromises. This article evaluates the Hot Case examination using Kane's validity framework and van der Vleuten's utility equation, and identifies issues with validity and reliability which could be managed through an ongoing improvement process.
-
Background: The best way to offer non-invasive respiratory support across several aetiologies of acute respiratory failure (ARF) is presently unclear. Both high flow nasal catheter (HFNC) therapy and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) may improve outcomes in critically ill patients by avoiding the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Objective: Describe the details of the protocol and statistical analysis plan designed to test whether HFNC therapy is non-inferior or even superior to NIPPV in patients with ARF due to different aetiologies. ⋯ Results and conclusions: RENOVATE is designed to provide evidence on whether HFNC therapy improves, compared with NIPPV, important patient-centred outcomes in different aetiologies of ARF. Here, we describe the rationale, design and status of the trial. Trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03643939.