Minerva ginecologica
-
Minerva ginecologica · Dec 2016
ReviewThe benefits of other treatments than in vitro fertilization to aid conception in minimal and mild endometriosis.
The treatment of minimal or mild endometriosis prior to non-in-vitro fertilization (IVF) assisted reproduction to improve pregnancy outcomes is controversial. Ovulation suppression may be offered to women who do not wish to conceive to suppress advancement of the disease. There is little evidence to suggest improvements in fertility associated ovarian suppression prior to non-IVF infertility treatments. ⋯ Although controversial, surgical ablation before ovulation induction may offer benefit but further studies would be helpful. Ovulation induction seems to increase pregnancy rates and either letrozole or clomiphene citrate should be considered as first line options. If pregnancy does not occur with three months of ovulation induction, based on dropping success rates with further cycles of ovarian stimulation, IVF should be offered.
-
Minerva ginecologica · Oct 2016
ReviewBreast cancer treatment in mutation carriers - surgical treatment.
The surgical option which should be reserved for patients with BRCA1/2 mutation and breast cancer diagnosis is still debated. Several aspects should be considered before the surgical decision-making: the risk of ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR), the risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC), the potential survival benefit of prophylactic mastectomy, and the possible risk factors that could either increase or decrease the risk for IBR or CBC. Breast conservative treatment (BCT) does not increase the risk for IBR in BRCA mutation carriers compared to non-carriers in short term follow-up; however, an increased risk for IBR in carriers was observed in studies with long follow-up. ⋯ For women with BRCA mutations candidate to mastectomy, preservation of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) may be highly important due to the generally younger age at time of surgery. Concerning the oncological safety, nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) is an acceptable option, with no evidence of compromise to oncological safety at short-term follow-up. The evaluation of surgical treatment in breast cancer patients with BRCA 1/2 mutation, should include several issues, namely the current evidence of adequate oncological safety of BCT in BRCA mutated patients; the increased risk for CBC especially in BRCA1 carriers; the feasibility on NSM with a greater patient's satisfaction for cosmetic results with no evidence of compromised oncological safety and, finally, the awareness that breast radiotherapy might increase the risk of complications in a possible subsequent mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction.
-
Minerva ginecologica · Aug 2016
Review Comparative StudyRobotic versus laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: which should we use?
This review of the literature aims at assessing the safety and effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery in benign and malignant gynecological diseases. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy is already widely used in the United States and Europe for the main gynecological procedure - hysterectomy - and has proved feasible and comfortable for other benign and malignant gynecological procedures. ⋯ More rigorous experimental studies are needed, that compare robotic-assisted surgery and laparoscopic surgery for gynecological diseases. However, current data seem to encourage the use of minimally-invasive surgery to treat benign and malignant gynecological diseases.
-
Minerva ginecologica · Apr 2016
ReviewShould we diagnose and treat minimal and mild endometriosis before medically assisted reproduction?
The treatment of minimal or mild endometriosis prior to assisted reproduction (ranging from intrauterine insemination to in vitro fertilization [IVF]) to improve the likelihood of success is controversial. Ovulation suppression is commonly used in endometriosis to decrease pain, however, there is little evidence to suggest improvements in fertility associated with this technique. ⋯ There is currently conflicting evidence regarding surgical ablation or removal of endometriomas prior to IVF, and its outcome on pregnancy rates. This review highlights the paucity of data in the management of endometriosis prior to assisted reproductive technologies and suggests that further studies are needed.
-
The study of preterm labor and prematurity has undergone a major transformation in its approach from an inevitable part of obstetrics with few answers to one in which science has led to knowledge and clinical intervention. Despite these advancements, understanding of preterm labor and prevention of prematurity is still limited. In the current review, we begin the discussion with fetal viability, first from a historical perspective and then from the understanding of this issue from a prospective of various professional organizations. ⋯ We focus on a European-based trial with preliminary results and an ongoing American counterpart. The current knowledge of molecular mechanisms behind preterm labor is presented with a focus on the multiple etiologies of preterm labor, both known and presumed, with updates in the basic science realm. Furthermore, we present up-to-date studies on prediction of preterm birth and prematurity-related morbidity.