Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology
-
Thirteen patients were intubated with cuffed reinforced spiral tracheal tubes. Intracuff pressure and volume were measured as the position of the head and neck was altered. No significant changes in intracuff pressure and volume were observed with lateral rotation of the head. ⋯ Reinflated intracuff volume decreased and reinflated intracuff pressure increased significantly, and residual excessive pressure was observed in 4 patients with flexion. Both reinflated intracuff volume and pressure increased significantly, and excessive pressure was observed in 8 patients and residual air-leak developed in a patient in spite of excessive pressure with extension. The authors speculate that endotracheal tube movement by changes in head and neck position has effects on intracuff pressure and volume.
-
We investigated the effects of combined inhalational and lumbar epidural anesthesia on body temperature in 8 women for long-lasting lower abdominal surgery. Probes for forehead deep temperature and skin-surface temperatures were placed on the forehead, forearm, fingertip and toe tip on patients' arrival at the operating room. Tympanic membrane temperature was also measured. ⋯ In conclusion, anesthetics-induced redistribution of body heat significantly affects the core temperature throughout anesthesia. Peripheral hypothermia results in core temperature drop when the redistribution is induced by anesthetics. Thermoregulatory vasoconstriction may not only suppress heat loss but also increase core temperature through centralization of body heat.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
[Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol is advantageous than thiopental-sevoflurane anesthesia in the recovery phase].
A randomized, prospective and multi-institutional study was performed to investigate whether different anesthetic methods affected differently the quality of recovery from anesthesia. Two hundred and eleven patients were allocated to one of two groups; total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and fentanyl (group P, n = 107) and general anesthesia with thiopental, sevoflurane and nitrous oxide (group TS, n = 104). ⋯ The postoperative incidence of vomiting was not significantly different between the two groups (3.7% in the group P and 9.6% in the group TS), but the postoperative incidences of nausea and headache were significantly lower in the group P compared with the group TS (10.3%, 17.8%, respectively in the group P and 34.6%, 29.8%, respectively in the group TS). We conclude that TIVA with propofol is advantageous than thiopental-sevoflurane anesthesia in the recovery phase.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Sedative and hypnotic properties of propofol during epidural or spinal anesthesia].
The sedative and hypnotic properties of propofol were studied in 40 patients undergoing elective gynecologic or orthopedic surgery using epidural (epidural group, n = 20) or spinal (spinal group, n = 20) anesthesia. Patients were given a bolus dose of 1 mg.kg-1 immediately followed by a continuous infusion of 4 mg.kg-1.h-1 of propofol after epidural or spinal anesthesia. The patients were asked to open their eyes on command at 10-sec interval from the end of the bolus infusion of propofol. ⋯ Oxygen inhalation was needed in 75% of the patients in the epidural group and 100% in the spinal group. These results indicate that bolus and continuous infusion of propofol produces rapid induction, deep level of sedation, and rapid recovery during epidural or spinal anesthesia. However, respiratory depression appeared at this infusion rate during regional anesthesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
[The effect of epidural saline injection on analgesic level during combined spinal and epidural anesthesia].
The purpose of this study is to clarify the volume effect of epidural saline injection 20 min after spinal anesthesia. Thirty patients undergoing combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for orthopedic surgery were randomly divided into two groups: a control group (n = 15) and a saline group (n = 15). In the control group, 2% lidocaine 3 ml with 0.4% tetracaine was injected into the subarachnoid space from L 4-5 interspace using Durasafe (Becton Dickinson, USA) and saline was not injected into the epidural space. ⋯ However, the levels of analgesia 3, 5, 10, 40 and 100 min after epidural saline injection in the saline group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The highest analgesic level was obtained 10 min after epidural saline injection and reached to T 4.3 +/- 1.1. In conclusion, epidural saline injection increases the analgesic level 20 min after spinal anesthesia because of the volume effect.