Anesthesiology clinics of North America
-
In conclusion, major complications after neuraxial techniques are rare but can be devastating to the patient and the anesthesiologist. Prevention and management begin during the preoperative visit with a careful evaluation of the patient's medical history and appropriate preoperative discussion of the risks and benefits of the available anesthetic techniques. Alternative anesthetic techniques, such as peripheral regional techniques or general anesthesia, should be considered for patients at increased risk for neurologic complications following neuraxial block. ⋯ Efforts should also be made to decrease neural injury in the operating room through careful patient positioning. Postoperatively, patients must be followed closely to detect potentially treatable sources of neurologic injury, including expanding spinal hematoma or epidural abscess, constrictive dressings, improperly applied casts, and increased pressure on neurologically vulnerable sites. New neurologic deficits should be evaluated promptly by a neurologist, or neurosurgeon, to document formally the patient's evolving neurologic status, arrange further testing or intervention, and provide long-term follow-up.
-
Spinal anesthesia can be used effectively and efficiently for a variety of cases in both the inpatient and the ambulatory surgery setting. Choice of agent, dose, distribution, use of adjuncts, and occasionally the use of continuous spinal anesthesia can tailor the spinal anesthetic to a specific type and duration of surgery. Although spinal anesthesia is extremely safe, adherence of new guidelines for patients receiving anticoagulant drugs, LMWH in particular, may minimize the risk of neurologic injury from spinal bleeding. ⋯ Spinal agents with long-acting analgesic properties that do not produce sensorimotor deficits may go beyond the immediate perioperative period and relieve postoperative pain. Currently there is controversy surrounding the use of spinal lidocaine and the occurrence of TNS, especially in the outpatient setting. The prudent use of small-dose bupivacaine and possibly procaine may reduce this risk, further supporting the use of spinal anesthesia for ambulatory as well as inpatient surgical procedures.
-
Anesthesiologists have become increasingly involved with the management of chronic pain patients in the operating room, on the surgical floor, and in the outpatient pain facility setting (often interdisciplinary). Based upon the authors' practice of regional anesthesia, the most specific contribution to chronic pain management arguably remains the practice of diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic injections of the neuraxis, peripheral nerves, and the autonomic nervous system.
-
Ambulatory surgery is increasing at unprecedented rates with more complex procedures being performed. This article reviews the benefits of the use of regional anesthesia during ambulatory surgeries. Regional anesthesia, by putting the anesthetic at the surgical site, provides ideal conditions for ambulatory surgery and provides a smooth, predictable post-operative course.
-
Epidural and spinal blocks are well-accepted regional techniques, but they have several disadvantages. The CSE technique can reduce or eliminate the risks of these disadvantages. CSE block combines the rapidity, density, and reliability of the subarachnoid block with the flexibility of continuous epidural block to extend duration of analgesia. ⋯ Despite a recent flurry of reports of meningitis with CSE procedures, there is no evidence the CSE block is more hazardous than epidural or subarachnoid block alone. Arguably, the single-space, needle-through-needle CSE technique will continue to improve with new needle designs and other advances to improve further the success rate and reduce complications, such as neurotrauma, PDPH, and infection. Over the past decade it has become clear that the CSE technique is a significant advance in regional blockade.