Journal of opioid management
-
To discuss the importance of specimen validity testing (SVT) in urine drug testing (UDT) and the clinical role it plays in identifying efforts to subvert the UDT process. ⋯ SVT has a significant place in healthcare efforts to measure patient adherence, behavior, and honesty in communication with clinicians. SVT is typically ordered by treating clinicians who use the results to make therapeutic decisions regarding specific medical problems of their patient, including those related to medication and illicit drug use. In the absence of SVT, a healthcare provider may fail to identify a patient's adulteration of their urine sample in an attempt at deceiving the provider. Moreover, the presence of some underlying medical conditions may obfuscate the UDT results.
-
Urine drug testing (UDT) services are provided by a variety of clinical, forensic, and reference/specialty laboratories. These UDT services differ based on the principal activity of the laboratory. Clinical laboratories provide testing primarily focused on medical care (eg, emergency care, inpatients, and outpatient clinics), whereas forensic laboratories perform toxicology tests related to postmortem and criminal investigations, and drug-free workplace programs. ⋯ Accreditation programs for clinical laboratories have existed for nearly half a century, and a federal certification program for drug-testing laboratories was established in the 1980s. Standards of practice for forensic toxicology services other than workplace drug testing have been established in recent years. However, no accreditation program currently exists for UDT in pain management, and this review considers several aspects of laboratory accreditation and certification relevant to toxicology services, with the intention to provide guidance to clinicians in their selection of the appropriate laboratory for UDT surveillance of their patients on opioid therapy.