Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement
-
Acta Neurochir. Suppl. · Jan 2007
Review Clinical TrialMotor cortex stimulation for neuropathic pain.
Since the initial publication of Tsubokawa in 1991, epidural motor cortex stimulation (MCS) is increasingly reported as an effective surgical option for the treatment of refractory neuropathic pain although its mechanism of action remains poorly understood. The authors review the extensive literature published over the last 15 years on central and neuropathic pain. Optimal patient selection remains difficult and the value of pharmacological tests or transcranial magnetic stimulation in predicting the efficacy of MCS has not been established. ⋯ In general, the efficacy of MCS depends on: a) the accurate placement of the stimulation electrode over the appropriate area of the motor cortex, and b) on sophisticated programming of the stimulation parameters. A better understanding of the MCS mechanism of action will probably make it possible to adjust better the stimulation parameters. The conclusions of multicentered randomised studies, now in progress, will be very useful and are likely to promote further research and clinical applications in this field.
-
Acta Neurochir. Suppl. · Jan 2007
ReviewNeurosurgical pain therapy with epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS).
Neurosurgical therapy for intractable pain with epidural implantable electrodes has become a widely used and efficient alternative when conservative or less invasive therapies are no longer effective. A complete interdisciplinary work-up is required before considering a patient as a candidate for a spinal cord stimulation (SCS) device. In more than 1300 patients we implanted an SCS device in our clinic; more than 52% reported a significant (>50%) long-term improvement for more than 3 years and a significant reduction in their analgesic drugs. ⋯ Hence. SCS therapy should only be performed in specialized centers. In peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and angina, the initial results are very promising, but the long-term efficacy has to be proven by multicenter studies.
-
Acta Neurochir. Suppl. · Jan 2007
ReviewSpinal cord stimulation in the treatment of chronic critical limb ischemia.
This paper reviews the clinical experience and proposed working mechanisms of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in the treatment of chronic critical limb ischemia (CCLI). SCS appears to provide a significant long-term relief of ischemic pain and to improve healing of small ulcers, most likely due to effects on the nutritional skin blood flow. Despite these observations, randomized trials were not able to show limb salvage. Assessment of the microcirculatory skin blood flow, by means of transcutaneous oxygen pressure measurements and videocapillaromicroscopy, is necessary to evaluate the remaining microcirculatory reserve capacity likely to be exploited by SCS and to help identify patients that will benefit most from this treatment and in whom stimulation could lead to limb salvage.
-
Acta Neurochir. Suppl. · Jan 2007
ReviewMotor cortex stimulation for chronic non-malignant pain: current state and future prospects.
Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) was proposed by Tsubokawa in 1991 for the treatment of post-stroke thalamic pain. Since that time, the indications have been increased and included trigeminal neuropathic pain and later other types of central and peripheral deafferentation pain. The results reported in the literature are quite good; the mean long-term success rate is 80% in facial pain and 53% in non-facial pain. ⋯ Biochemical processes involving endorphins and GABA may also be implicated in the mechanism of MCS. It is time for a large multicenter prospective randomized double blind study evaluating not only the effect of MCS on pain (based on the available guidelines for assessment of neuropathic pain), but also the optimal electrode placement and stimulation parameters, and the possible relationship with the response to rTMS. New electrode design and a new generation of stimulators may help in improving the results.
-
Acta Neurochir. Suppl. · Jan 2007
Clinical TrialDiaphragm pacing with a spinal cord stimulator: current state and future directions.
Diaphragm pacing with electrical stimulation of the phrenic nerve is an established treatment for central hypoventilation syndrome. The device, however, is not readily available. We tested the same spinal cord stimulator we use for pain control in phrenic nerve stimulation. ⋯ The amplitude of the output was adjusted to obtain sufficient tidal volume and to maintain PaCO2 at around 40 mm Hg. During a follow-up period up to four years, stable and sufficient ventilation was observed in all patients without any complications. Although further long follow-up is necessary, diaphragm pacing with the spinal cord stimulator is feasible and effective for the treatment of the central hypoventilation syndrome.