Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement
-
Brain stimulation has been receiving increasing attention as an alternative therapy for epilepsy that cannot be treated by either antiepileptic medication or surgical resection of the epileptogenic focus. The stimulation methods include transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or electrical stimulation by implanted devices of the vagus nerve (VNS), deep brain structures (DBS) (thalamic or hippocampal), cerebellar or cortical areas. TMS is the simplest and least invasive approach. ⋯ Finally, another line of research investigates the usefulness of implantable seizure detection devices. The current chapter presents the most important evidence on the above methods. Furthermore, other important issues are reviewed such as the selection criteria of patients for brain stimulation and the potential role of brain stimulation in the treatment of depression in epileptic patients.
-
Acta Neurochir. Suppl. · Jan 2007
ReviewAnatomical and physiological basis and mechanism of action of neurostimulation for epilepsy.
Neurostimulation is an emerging treatment for neurological diseases. Different types of neurostimulation exist mainly depending of the part of the nervous system that is being affected and the way this stimulation is being administered. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a neurophysiological treatment for patients with medically or surgically refractory epilepsy. ⋯ Several new indications such as obsessive compulsive behaviour and cluster headache are being investigated with promising results. The vast progress in biotechnology along with the experience in other neurological diseases in the past ten years has led to a renewed interest in intracerebral stimulation for epilepsy. Epilepsy centers around the world have recently reinitiated trials with deep brain stimulation in different intracerebral structures such as the thalamus, the hippocampus and the subthalamic nucleus.
-
Acta Neurochir. Suppl. · Jan 2007
ReviewManagement of chronic severe pain: spinal neuromodulatory and neuroablative approaches.
The spinal cord is the target of many neurosurgical procedures used to treat pain. Compactness and well-defined tract separation in addition to well understood dermatomal cord organization make the spinal cord an ideal target for pain procedures. Moreover, the presence of opioid and other receptors involved in pain modulation at the level of the dorsal horn increases the suitability of the spinal cord. ⋯ Spinal neuroablation can also involve cellular elements such as with trigeminal nucleotomy and the dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) operation. The DREZ operation is indicated for phantom type pain and root avulsion injuries. Due to its reversible nature spinal neuromodulation prevails, and spinal neuroablation is performed in a few select cases.
-
Acta Neurochir. Suppl. · Jan 2007
ReviewDual electrode spinal cord stimulation in chronic leg and back pain.
Patients with chronic back and leg pain (CBLP) suffer from a disabling spinal condition of multifactorial origin and are often resistant to medical therapy. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a minimally invasive option for treatment of chronic pain in these patients, which involves placement of epidural electrodes close to the midline of the spinal cord. SCS was originally introduced and used for decades with a single electrode. ⋯ It has been hypothesized that using dual electrodes may improve long term outcome for CBLP patients compared with single electrodes. Current evidence however does not lend strong support to this assumption. Given the high cost of treatments for CBLP and of SCS itself, there is an urgent need for high-quality evidence for the effectiveness of dual electrode SCS in relieving pain and/or improving function in patients with CBLP.
-
Epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used as a method to improve microcirculatory blood flow, relieve ischemic pain and reduce amputation rate in patients with severe peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). In this article, the theories attempting to explain the mechanisms of SCS vasoactive action are presented. ⋯ The contemporary reports demonstrate the efficacy of SCS in ischemic pain relief. In the light of these results and our own experience, we conclude with an appraisal of modern techniques for assessing critical limb ischemia.