Zhonghua yi xue za zhi
-
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi · Jun 2017
[Efficacy of mitral valve repair versus replacement in severe ischemic mitral regurgitation].
Objective: To compare the mortality, survival rate and the therapeutic efficacy between mitral valve repair and replacement as treatment for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR), and explore the middle- and long-term outcomes. Methods: Between January 2000 and January 2016, 378 patients with severe IMR underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) combined with mitral valve repair (n=162) or mitral valve replacement (n=216) in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery of Nanjing First Hospital. Clinical data, in-hospital morbidity and mortality of patients were retrospectively reviewed. ⋯ The rate of valve-related complications was significantly higher in the repair group compared with the replacement group (8.82% vs 3.82%, P=0.003). Conclusions: We should choose the surgical methods carefully (replacement or repair) for severe IMR patients according to degree of left ventricular remodeling and pathological changes of mitral valve. Mitral valve replacement with preservation of the subvalvular apparatus is a safe and effective surgical alternative for mitral valve repair, especially for patients with complications or complex reflux.