Regional anesthesia
-
Regional anesthesia · Nov 1990
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialContinuous infusion epidural anesthesia during labor: a randomized, double-blind comparison of 0.0625% bupivacaine/0.002% butorphanol and 0.125% bupivacaine.
The efficacy of pain relief and the maternal and neonatal effects of continuous epidural infusion of 0.0625% bupivacaine/0.002% butorphanol was compared with the infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine alone in a randomized, double-blind study of 32 women in labor. A test dose of 2 ml 0.5% bupivacaine was given to every patient and followed by two epidural regimens in randomized, double-blind manner. Group B-B (bupivacaine/butorphanol) patients received 7.5 ml 0.125% bupivacaine plus 1 mg butorphanol (0.5 ml) followed by an infusion of 0.0625% bupivacaine/0.002% butorphanol at a rate of 12 ml/hour; Group B (bupivacaine alone) patients received 8 ml 0.25% bupivacaine followed by an infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine at a rate of 12 ml/hour. ⋯ Progress of labor and the mode of delivery did not differ significantly between the two groups. All infants were vigorous and had normal acid-base status and neurologic adaptive capacity scores. Butorphanol appears to be useful as an adjunct to epidural bupivacaine for continuous epidural infusion during labor without adversely affecting the mother or the neonate.
-
Regional anesthesia · Nov 1990
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialSacralization of epidural block with repeated doses of 0.25% bupivacaine during labor.
A descriptive analysis of the progression of epidural block with repeated doses of 0.25% bupivacaine was performed, assessing pain relief (visual analog scoring), dermatomal spread of sensory and motor block, and the associated management and outcome of labor. The influence of epinephrine 1:200,000 on these observations was also assessed by the random assignment of study patients into two groups, one receiving 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine plain (n = 28) and another group receiving 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with commercially added epinephrine 1:200,000 (n = 27). Only primigravid patients were studied. ⋯ Both groups received a similar dose of bupivacaine and experienced comparable management and outcome of labor. Epinephrine in a 1:200,000 concentration did not influence the changing characteristics of the epidural block over time. The duration of labor was not significantly different between groups (10.3 +/- 5.2 hours for the plain group and 11.0 +/- 4.7 hours for the epinephrine group).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Regional anesthesia · Nov 1990
Hemodynamic response to low-dose epinephrine infusion during hypotensive epidural anesthesia for total hip replacement.
The hemodynamic response to reduction in blood pressure after epidural anesthesia in elderly patients is poorly defined. Therefore, hemodynamic measurements using radial artery and thermodilution pulmonary artery catheters were performed in 85 patients undergoing total hip replacement in whom blood pressure was allowed to decrease in order to minimize blood loss. Measurements were made in the lateral position prior to and after induction of epidural anesthesia to T4 or above when mean arterial pressure (MAP) had fallen to 50-55 mmHg. ⋯ Low-dose epinephrine infusions modified this response by increasing SV and CI and reducing SVR, but had little consistent effect on PAD, HR and LVSWI. Increases in SV and CI were significantly related to the dose of epinephrine administered. Low-dose intravenous epinephrine infusions preserve cardiac output during hypotensive epidural anesthesia in elderly patients.
-
Regional anesthesia · Nov 1990
Continuous spinal anesthesia after unintentional dural puncture in parturients.
Headache after unintentional dural puncture with 17- or 18-gauge needles represents a significant source of anesthetic-induced maternal morbidity. We performed this study to determine whether inserting a catheter into the subarachnoid space after dural puncture can significantly alter the incidence of headache. Thirty-five women, requesting labor analgesia, suffered a dural puncture during attempts to identify the epidural space using an 18-gauge Hustead needle (bevel oriented parallel to the longitudinal axis of the back). ⋯ Neither the incidence of headache nor the need for therapeutic blood patch differed significantly between the two groups of women. No other anesthetic related complications ensued. Continuous spinal anesthesia after unintentional dural puncture does not decrease the incidence of headache in parturients.
-
In 1988, the American College of Obstetricians and gynecologists (ACOG) decided that vaginal delivery after a previous cesarean delivery (trial of labor, TOL) was an acceptable alternative to elective repeat cesarean delivery. ACOG stated that there appears to be no absolute contraindication to epidural anesthesia for labor during TOL. The concern is that should there be a uterine rupture, would the epidural anesthesia mask the abdominal pain? The incidence of complete rupture with trial of labor is reported to be 0.3-0.5%. ⋯ There have been no reports of epidural anesthesia delaying the diagnosis of uterine rupture. In the review of 10,967 patients undergoing TOL, there were no maternal deaths and only nine fetal deaths secondary to complete uterine rupture. The literature strongly suggests that epidural anesthesia is safe in TOL even when oxytocin is used for augmentation of labor.