CRNA : the clinical forum for nurse anesthetists
-
Review Comparative Study
Setting the record straight on nurse anesthesia and medical anesthesiology education.
The history, qualifications, capabilities, and legal status of nurse anesthetists in the United States have been perceived by organized anesthesiology as both a professional and economic threat to the medical specialty. Such threats often lead to turf battles in which groups try to seek public affirmation of their point of view through ongoing public and/or government relation debate and activism. Medicine, including anesthesiology, has used educational preparation of physician and nurse specialists as a favorite topic for such activism. ⋯ This article is aimed at setting right the facts in the current debate used by the American Society of Anesthesiologists in regards to the comparative analysis of CRNA and anesthesiologist education. Because medicine most often uses length of education as a quality measure of that education, regardless of the validity of such arguments, this comparison is set within that framework. Unfortunately, it will not be the last work on this subject.
-
Healthcare practitioners are the primary users of medical devices for direct patient care. As such, they are in the best position to recognize problems that result from the use of medical devices. The outcome of a device-related adverse event or product problem, as with any other medical product, can be serious and result in illness injury, or even death. ⋯ Healthcare practitioners are major contributors to the knowledge base related to device use and safety through astute monitoring, rapid identification of device-related problems, and reporting these problems. An understanding of the voluntary and mandatory mechanism of reporting will ensure that device problems are reported appropriately and in a timely manner. As the primary users of medical equipment for direct patient care, health care professionals have the training and expertise to improve patient care by reporting actual and suspected problems with medical devices.
-
Anesthesia providers are expected to provide information to the patient during the preanesthesia interview that enables the patient to make informed choices. Adequate disclosure during the informed consent process ensures the equalization of the practitioner/patient relationship and the decision-making rights of the patient. Both certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) and anesthesiologists are not only legally required to provide information that will allow a patient to make an informed judgment about how to proceed with various anesthetic modalities but are also obligated by their standards of practice. This article informs the CRNA about the principles of informed consent so that they can better understand their role in the informed consent process.
-
The National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB), created by the 1986 Health Care Quality Improvement Act, has been in operation since 1990. Hospitals and other credentialing bodies must query the NPDB when granting and renewing privileges. The NPDB receives about 25,000 reports of adverse actions against health practitioners each year. ⋯ Only 2% of matched reports to the NPDB made a difference in hospital privileging decisions. A limitation of NPDB information is that malpractice payments recorded in the NPDB do not necessarily constitute a comprehensive and definitive reflection of actual health care incompetence. All health care providers need to be aware of the NPDB, its mission, potential impact on their ability to be credentialed, and proposed additional uses of its information.