Langenbecks Archiv für Chirurgie. Supplement. Kongressband. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Chirurgie. Kongress
-
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd · Jan 1998
Multicenter Study[The diagnostic value of rectal examination of patients with acute appendicitis].
The results of rectal digital examinations performed on 477 patients upon admission with histopathologically proven acute appendicitis from a total of 2280 patients with acute abdominal pain were analyzed. Although 13.7% of the patients experienced pain on the right side and 7.4% pain in the pouch of Douglas during rectal examination, none of the rectal examination parameters was statistically significant for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. There are well established and statistically significant clinical indications, such as guarding, rigidity, rebound tenderness or abdominal distention that actually make the unpleasant rectal-digital examination superfluous for patients with suspected appendicitis.
-
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd · Jan 1998
Multicenter Study Clinical Trial[Procalcitonin as marker of systemic inflammatory reaction after isolated extremity perfusion].
The systemic side effects of isolated limb perfusion (ILP) with rhTNF alpha and melphalan are characterised by the induction of a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Procalcitonin (PCT), a serum marker of bacterial sepsis, was investigated with respect to its role in SIRS after TNF-ILP. Serum-PCT was analysed in 24 patients (12 male, 12 female), who treated by ILP for regionally metastasized melanoma (n = 8) or locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma (n = 16). ⋯ Serum procalcitonin is induced as part of the specific SIRS after ILP with rhTNF alpha and melphalan. It may be induced directly by rhTNF alpha or by different cytokines, as serum peaks of IL-6 and IL-8 are reached well before the peak of PCT. Determination of PCT prior to and after ILP with TNF might be useful to assess patients at risk of developing hyperdynamic shock.
-
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd · Jan 1998
Multicenter Study[Clinical value of diagnostic score for appendicitis: results of a prospective intervention study].
The clinical benefit of a diagnostic score for acute appendicitis was tested in a prospective interventional multicenter study on patients with abdominal pain. The study was performed in two consecutive phases: standard diagnostic work-up with no additional diagnostic support (870 patients) and additional diagnostic support with a score (614 patients). ⋯ There were no differences in the perforated appendix, negative appendectomy and complication rate, however, the delayed appendectomy rate (2% versus 8%) and the delayed discharge rate (11% versus 22%) were significantly lower with diagnostic support by the score. In summary, the score cannot be recommended as a standard diagnostic tool for diagnostic decision making in acute appendicitis.