Revue de chirurgie orthopédique et réparatrice de l'appareil moteur
-
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot · Apr 2008
Review Comparative Study[Hallux valgus surgery in 2005. Conventional, mini-invasive or percutaneous surgery? Uni- or bilateral? Hospitalisation or one-day surgery?].
There remains a good deal of controversy concerning forefoot surgery. Certain concepts such as conventional procedures, minimally invasive surgery, or percutaneous surgery are promoted because of their specific advantages including rapid recovery and compatibility with a short hospital stay or even outpatient surgery. Nevertheless, in 2005 many questions remain unanswered and highly variable practices have been basically founded on personal experience rather than scientific evidence. ⋯ Statistically, there is very little difference in the short term between the different techniques. A much longer study would be necessary to obtain evidence to guide our practices. While there is certainly no reason to condemn one method or another, surgeons must be careful about the promises given to patients which are generally based on personal experience but not necessarily supported by rigorous scientific data.
-
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot · Apr 2008
Comparative Study[Intramedullary pinning of diaphyseal fractures of both forearm bones in adults: 46 cases].
The goal when treating shaft fractures of the forearm bones is to obtain good bone healing with good preservation of upper limb function. We report a retrospective (1995-2004) consecutive series of patients aged 32 years on average (range 16 to 92 years) who presented 46 shaft fractures of both forearm bones. ⋯ Intramedullary pinning is an attractive alternative for the treatment of shaft fractures involving both forearm bones in adults. Best results are obtained if the fracture (situated outside the 5th sixth) can be stabilized without opening the focus with a single 2.5 mm pin. This method combines the advantages of closed osteosynthesis, that is, a simple nontraumatic procedure decreasing the risk of suppuration, and early return of function, limiting postoperative immobilization. It enables early sturdy bone healing with a low risk of recurrent fracture.
-
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot · Apr 2008
Comparative Study[Volar fixed angle plate LCP 3.5 for dorsally distal radius fracture. About 24 cases].
Fracture of the distal radius with posterior displacement is the most common wrist fracture. Pinning is generally proposed. The problem is that a secondary displacement may persist, even for the least complex fractures. With the advent of the fixed-angle plate with a self-locking screw, we considered using this method in combination with an anterior approach to the radius. We report our preliminary results. ⋯ This study demonstrated that, used on the anterior aspect of the radius, the locking compression plate provides satisfactory treatment for fractures of the distal radius with posterior displacement. Because of the angular stability, the reduction can be maintained over time so that secondary displacement is no longer a problem. This is a difficult technique which requires particular skill. We no longer recommend the LCP 3.5 plate due to the poorly adapted ergonometry, the late fracture over the plate and the fact that the material is not removed.