Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics
-
Surg Gynecol Obstet · Oct 1993
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialBlood loss at time of cesarean section by method of placental removal and exteriorization versus in situ repair of the uterine incision.
The current study was undertaken to determine if blood loss at the time of cesarean section is affected by method of placental removal (spontaneous versus extracted) or uterine position for repair (in situ versus exteriorized). This prospective randomized study involved 100 women who were undergoing a cesarean section. The patients were placed into one of four groups--1, spontaneous placenta detachment, in situ uterine repair; 2, spontaneous placental detachment, exteriorized uterine repair; 3, manual placental removal, in situ uterine repair, and 4, manual placental removal, exteriorized uterine repair. ⋯ Uterine position did not significantly affect blood loss in the spontaneous group (1 and 2; p = 0.971) or the manual placental removal groups (3 and 4; p = 0.061). The hematocrit values for all groups were similar preoperatively, but postoperatively, were significantly lower in the manual removal groups when compared with the spontaneous placental separation groups (p < 0.001). The method of placental removal and not the position of the uterus at the time of its repair has a significant role in blood loss during cesarean birth.
-
Displaced sternal fractures cause extensive pain and may impair ventilatory efforts, particularly in the elderly. Most previous reports have focused on repair of sternal fractures using wires. We recommend the technique of plate fixation described herein.
-
Since April 1991, we have used the eversion technique to perform carotid endarterectomy in 31 consecutive procedures. There were no operative deaths in the current series, and no neurologic complications have been observed. We believe this technique decreases the possibility of early and late restenosis and recommend it for patients requiring carotid endarterectomy.