Curēus
-
The objective of this study was to conduct a review of the benefits and adverse effects of cannabis (or marijuana) legalization in various states across the US. The current study offers a preliminary evaluation of the problems concerning marijuana legalization in several states, with the primary goal being the assessment of the impact of laws and policies governing the legalization and use of marijuana for medical purposes. A comprehensive search on cannabis and its derivatives was performed using multiple resource databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CENTRAL (Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials), government web sources, and the Department of Public Health databases. ⋯ Accordingly, in states where marijuana is used for its medicinal value and recreational purposes, people have different views on the legalization of marijuana. The complete effect of legalizing and commercializing marijuana on consumers' mental health and their educational outcomes is expected to take a longer duration prior to its achievement; unfortunately, fewer merits are anticipated. Most of the reports evaluated in this article proved to be marred with inconsistencies. Many of the stated claims did not pass a methodical evaluation. Going forward, additional data from available sources will lead to stronger conclusions. We weighed the pros and cons of marijuana legalization. However, we are certain that consumers can make better decisions by weighing each opinion by its reliability and safety.
-
Objective Stroke is the fifth leading cause of death in the United States and the leading cause of disability. Hemorrhagic stroke has higher risks of mortality and neurologic deficit. Higher still, acute intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) has mortality between 50% and 80% while complicating subarachnoid hemorrhage in 15% of cases and intracerebral hemorrhage in 40% of cases. ⋯ Conclusion These findings argue for larger prospective trials of EVD day two rt-PA protocol inception in acute IVH. Reported ventriculitis rates with EVDs are 8.8%, while we demonstrated a rate of 18% without significant effects except in ICU LOS. Transcatheter intraventricular rt-PA is safe and effective as an adjuvant in acute spontaneous intraventricular hemorrhage with the greatest benefit of rt-PA protocol at EVD day two.
-
Background Early diagnosis and management of raised intracranial pressure (ICP) is essential for preventing brain damage and even death. Invasive monitoring is the gold standard to measure raised ICP but it may not be feasible in a heterogeneous group of patients. Noninvasively, a simple bedside ocular ultrasound can detect elevated ICP. ⋯ ROC curve was created and observed that AUC of right and left eyes was 0.815 (95% CI: 0.61 to 0.99) and 0.69 (95% CI: 0.37 to 0.99). Conclusion According to this study, ventriculostomy measurements of ICP are directly correlated with ultrasound ONSD measurements. Hence, we conclude that ONSD measured by ocular ultrasound is a simple yet effective method to detect raised ICP.
-
Leaders in medical education have developed milestones and core competencies in an attempt to ensure that relational skills, such as communication and professionalism, are emphasized in addition to the usual skills of medical knowledge, data gathering, and emergency stabilization during students' emergency medicine (EM) medical education. Providers facile in each of these areas have better patient outcomes, patient experiences, and decreased incidence of malpractice cases. The authors attempted to demonstrate that by deliberate teaching of these skills during an EM medical student clerkship, students could significantly improve their clinical performance. ⋯ A one-on-one preceptor shift can result in a statistically significant improvement in data gathering and professionalism skills as measured by OSCEs.
-
Introduction We conducted a survey to describe the practice characteristics of anesthesiologists who have passed the American Board of Anesthesiology (ABA) Pediatric Anesthesiology Certification Examination. Methods In July 2017, a list of anesthesiologists who had taken the ABA Pediatric Anesthesiology Certification Examination (hereafter referred to as "pediatric anesthesiologists") was obtained from the American Board of Anesthesiologists (theaba.org). Email contact information for these individuals was collected from departmental rosters, email distribution lists, hospital or anesthesia group profiles, manuscript author contact information, website source code, and other publicly available online sources. The survey was designed using Qualtrics (Qualtrics, Provo, Utah; Seattle, Washington), a web-based tool, to ascertain residency/fellowship training history and current practice characteristics that includes: years in practice, clinical work hours per week, primary hospital setting, practice type, supervision model, estimated percentage of cases by patient age group, and percentage of respondents who cared for any patient undergoing a fellowship-level index cases within the previous year. ⋯ The majority of respondents (64.3%) in academic practice work in freestanding children's hospitals. Pediatric anesthesiologists in academic practice and private practice with academic affiliations reported caring for a greater number of younger children and doing a wider variety of index cases than respondents in private practice. Conclusion The extent to which pediatric anesthesiologists care for pediatric patients - particularly young children and those undergoing complex cases - varies. The variability in practice characteristics is likely a result of differences in hospital type, anesthesia practice type, geographic location, and other factors.