Prescrire international
-
Prescrire international · Feb 2007
Comparative StudyDrotrecogin alfa: a second look. More clinical trials in severe sepsis: mostly negative results.
(1) The initial evaluation of drotrecogin alfa in the treatment of severe sepsis did not convincingly demonstrate the therapeutic potential of this recombinant form of activated protein C. It mainly included one study (PROWESS), a double-blind placebo-controlled trial, involving 1690 patients with sepsis of varying severities. In this trial, drotrecogin alfa seemed to reduce the overall mortality rate at 28 days from 31% to 25%. ⋯ There was no evidence of a reduction in mortality with drotrecogin alfa (overall mortality rate 18%). (5) A paediatric placebo-controlled trial was interrupted after 477 children had been enrolled, because drotrecogin alfa was ineffective and caused severe bleeding. (6) Data from ongoing comparative and non comparative studies confirm the increased risk of severe bleeding during drotrecogin alfa therapy, affecting about 7% of patients. (7) In practice, despite trials involving thousands of patients, there are still no firmly identified patient subgroups in which drotrecogin alfa is clearly beneficial. In contrast, the increased bleeding risk is well documented. Drotrecogin alfa should not be routinely used in the management of patients with severe sepsis.
-
Prescrire international · Feb 2007
Alcohol withdrawal syndrome: how to predict, prevent, diagnose and treat it.
(1) When people who are physically dependent on alcohol stop drinking, they experience an alcohol withdrawal syndrome. The symptoms generally resolve spontaneously within a week, but more severe forms may be associated with generalised seizures, hallucinations and delirium tremens, which can be fatal. (2) We carried out a literature review in order to obtain answers to the following questions: how to predict or rapidly diagnose a severe alcohol withdrawal syndrome; how to prevent and treat this syndrome; how to manage severe forms; and how to deal with the risk of vitamin B1 deficiency. (3) The main risk factors for severe withdrawal syndrome are: chronic heavy drinking; a history of generalised seizures; and a history of delirium tremens. (4) Anxiety, agitation, tremor, excessive sweating, altered consciousness and hallucinations are signs of a severe withdrawal syndrome. (5) Individual support and effective communication seem to reduce the risk of severe withdrawal syndrome. (6) Oral benzodiazepines are the best-assessed drugs for preventing a severe alcohol withdrawal syndrome, particularly the risk of seizures. When given for a maximum of 7 days, the adverse effects are usually mild. (7) Clinical trials of other antiepileptics suggest they are less effective than benzodiazepines, and their addition to benzodiazepine therapy offers no tangible advantage. (8) Betablockers increase the risk of hallucinations, and clonidine increases the risk of nightmares, and the efficacy of these two drugs is not well documented. ⋯ Outpatient withdrawal may be more appropriate for patients who are at low risk of developing severe withdrawal syndrome. (13) A large proportion of alcohol-dependent patients were excluded from trials of withdrawal strategies. These include elderly patients, patients with serious psychiatric or somatic disorders, and patients who are also dependent on other substances. (14) An oral benzodiazepine is the best-assessed treatment for a single episode of generalised seizures or hallucinations during alcohol withdrawal. (15) In randomised comparative trials benzodiazepines were more effective than neuroleptics in preventing delirium-related mortality. Currently, with appropriate fluid-electrolyte support, continuous monitoring of vital signs, and respiratory support if necessary, the mortality rate for delirium tremens is under 3%. (16) In practice, patients who are attempting to stop drinking alcohol need close personal support and communication, and a reassuring environment, as well as regular monitoring for early signs of a withdrawal syndrome; the latter may require benzodiazepine therapy.
-
(1) Worldwide, there are an estimated 6000 to 7000 rare diseases. Patients face special difficulties in obtaining an accurate diagnosis, adequate information about the disease, and access to qualified specialists. (2) Drug companies do not spontaneously conduct research on drugs for rare diseases, mainly because of the limited market for each indication. Only a few dozen of these drugs were available in France before 2000. (3) In 2000 the European Union adopted a Regulation, based on experience in the United States, aimed at promoting the development of drugs for patients suffering from rare diseases, i.e. 'orphan drugs'. (4) In Europe, orphan drug status can be granted when the prevalence of the disease does not exceed 5 cases per 10 000 inhabitants (or when it is more frequent but profitability is likely to be inadequate). (5) Companies that market an orphan drug receive a variety of financial assistance as well as a 10-year marketing monopoly. (6) Between April 2000 and April 2005, 268 medicinal products received European orphan drug status and 22 were granted European marketing authorization. (7) Access to these drugs varies greatly from one European Union Member State to another, mainly because of the high annual treatment costs (up to 300 000 euros per patient). ⋯ Clinical research and evaluation should continue after marketing authorization has been granted. (11) More drugs, with better-documented efficacy and safety, are now available for patients who previously had no effective treatment options. Yet there is too much duplication and too little evaluation, and too many drugs are extremely expensive, meaning that patients in many European countries cannot benefit. And many rare diseases are still neglected.