Prescrire international
-
Prescrire international · Dec 2009
Complex regional pain syndrome type 1. Some treatments assessed versus placebo, limited efficacy.
(1) Complex regional pain syndrome type 1 generally occurs after trauma and usually affects a limb; (2) How is complex regional pain syndrome type 1 diagnosed? What is its natural course? How safe and effective are available treatments? To answer these questions, we reviewed the literature using the standard Prescrire methodology; (3) Diagnosis is mainly based on clinical features, including pain disproportionate to the initial trauma, associated with cutaneous vasomotor, trophic and sweating disorders; (4) Some clinical signs call for additional examinations to help rule out another vascular, neurological, infectious or rheumatic disorder. Radiological evidence of bone demineralisation supports the diagnosis, but radiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and scintigraphy generally contribute little to the diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome; (5) Some patients recover spontaneously after a few weeks, while others develop chronic pain or even severe disability after a period of years; (6) The results of small placebo-controlled trials suggest that corticosteroids are effective during the initial phase of this syndrome; (7) A very high oral dose of alendronic acid provided sustained pain relief in a randomised trial. Other studies suggest that bisphosphonates have some impact. ⋯ These methods have not been comparatively evaluated; (14) In practice, there is no truly effective treatment for complex regional pain syndrome. The few beneficial treatments have not been directly compared with one another. The advantages and disadvantages of the various treatment options must be discussed with each patient.
-
(1) When an antidepressant is considered a necessary addition to psychological support in treating patients with depression, the first-line drug is a tricyclic such as clomipramine or a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) such as paroxetine; (2) Agomelatine, a melatonin receptor agonist, is approved in the European Union for the treatment of depression; (3) Available evaluation does not include any clinical trials designed to compare the efficacy of agomelatine with that of a tricyclic or a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Most data come from 7 placebo-controlled trials; (4) Agomelatine (25 mg/day) was statistically more effective (on a rating scale) than placebo in only 3 of these 7 trials. The clinical relevance of the score improvements is questionable. ⋯ Dizziness, gastrointestinal and cutaneous disorders have been observed. Agomelatine is probably hepatotoxic; (8) In summary, agomelatine has unproven efficacy and poorly documented adverse effects. It is better to continue to use older antidepressants such as tricyclics or serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
-
(1) New marketing authorizations continue to be granted for treatments of multiple myeloma, and new trials and meta-analyses continue to be published. This review re-examines our previous conclusions based on data published between 2003 and 2008. We again used the standard Prescrire methodology to review the latest data; (2) In patients who are symptomatic but who do not qualify for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (especially people aged over 65), the results of five comparative trials suggest that adding thalidomide to the melphalan-prednisone combination delays myeloma progression by an additional 5 to 10 months. ⋯ Initial treatment with two successive transplantation procedures has a negative risk-benefit balance. (4) The optimal chemotherapy regimen prior to autologous stem cell transplantation is controversial. It is unclear which combination (vincristine + doxorubicin + dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide + dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide + dexamethasone, or bortezomib + dexamethasone, etc.) has a better risk-benefit balance in terms of survival and quality of life; (5) According to a meta-analysis of three clinical trials, thalidomide maintenance therapy appears to improve overall survival after Autologous stem cell transplantation; (6) Despite their inadequate evaluation, lenalidomide and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin are licensed for use in patients who relapse or who are refractory to initial treatment. In view of their major adverse effects, we consider that these drugs should only be used in clinical trials.