Zeitschrift für ärztliche Fortbildung und Qualitätssicherung
-
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich · Jan 2007
[Limitations to the physician's discretionary and therapeutic freedom and to the provision of health care for the general population by a shortage of financial and human resources--the rules of Section 2 Para. 1 and 4 of the Medical Professional Code of conduct and how much they are really worth].
Up to the early 1990's the health care system was essentially characterised through:--the insured' right of choice of therapist,--therapeutic freedom of patients and physicians, and--the freedom of establishment for medical doctors.--In accordance with the Hospital Funding Act the hospital system was--in compliance with federal constitutional law using capacity requirements--based on the "fire-fighting" principle, i.e. that if required, every patient should have access to a suitable hospital bed within about 15 minutes.--The responsibility for ensuring the provision of general and specialist health care services had been conferred by the government to the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (1955) in the legal form of a public corporation. In the face of a foreseeable rise in expenses as a result of advances in medicine and a higher demand for health care services because of the demographic development (long-life society) the Advisory Council for Concerted Action in Health Care concludes in its Annual Report that maintaining this level of health care for all people is not financially viable any longer. This is why the state--on the basis of the Health Care Reform Act of 2002 and the Statutory Health Insurance System Modernisation Act of 2004--retreated from the provision of services in the ambulatory and inpatient setting by privatising these sectors and by proclaiming competition (introduction of diagnosis-related groups). ⋯ With regard to the assessment of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures the Joint Federal Committee (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, G-BA) in the summer of 2005 gave itself a Code of Procedures that defines uniform cross-sector criteria for the appraisal of diagnosis and treatment. In Germany the principle of evidence-based health care has by law--and this is unique as compared to other countries--fully penetrated everyday health care where the decisions of the Joint Federal Committee in the form of directives have mandatory effect for health care providers and hence for the insured, too. This is why the German Medical Association and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians have embarked on the implementation of the "National Programme for Disease Management Guidelines" and the "Health Services Research" Project as a means of continuously evaluating health care provision which are intended to guide the future political control of the system of statutory health insurance in terms of target-performance comparisons and for the purpose of identifying health care deficits.
-
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich · Jan 2007
[Interdisciplinarity and chronic pain therapy--implementation of a new Interdisciplinary Center at the University Hospital Dresden on the basis of an integrated health care contract].
Due to the bio-psycho-social complexity and presence of various health departments, chronic pain requires interdisciplinary cooperation which enables the accurate evaluation of the clinical findings and is a prerequisite for an individual and resource-oriented therapeutic concept focusing on both physical and mental activation. This concept forms the basis of medical care at the University Pain Center, which was founded in April 2004 at the Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital in Dresden. ⋯ Following a draft version of a coherent multimodal, interdisciplinary healthcare concept along with full cost accounting after 1 1/2 years, an integrative healthcare contract got signed by two health insurances (AOK-Sachsen and VdAK) in June 2004. After two years of existence, the first experiences, results and especially the Pain Center's treatment spectrum ought to be demonstrated.
-
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich · Jan 2007
Patient and citizen participation in German health care--current state and future perspectives.
Patient participation within the German healthcare system is described at three different levels: the macro level as active patient influence on the regulation of medical care, the meso level in terms of institutions enhancing patient information and counselling, and the micro level focusing on the actual treatment decision-making process in the medical encounter. The main focus of the present publication is on the health care system-specific influences on patient participation in medical decision-making and on the current state of research and implementation of shared decision-making in Germany. ⋯ The present state of the intervention projects' results is outlined as well as subsequently funded transfer projects and future perspectives of research grants. Supported by health politics and the utilisation of scientific evidence shared decision-making's transfer into practice is considered to be relevant to the German health care system.
-
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich · Jan 2007
[Participation of patients in the program for national disease management guidelines--current state and implications].
Patient involvement has been implemented in the Program for National Disease Management Guidelines since 2005. Currently patient/consumer participation is being incorporated in terms of patients' comments of consultation papers on National Disease Management Guidelines (NDMG) and in the development of NDMG-based patient guidelines (PG). The editorial activities in patient guideline development from the beginnings to its publication are conducted in close cooperation with the patient representatives appointed by the Patient Forum. ⋯ It describes the current state of patient involvement and joint work and indicates the implications that can be derived from patient participation in the NDMG Program. Accompanying the involvement procedures, experiences resulting from previous NDMG and PG development activities are continuously investigated for the possibility of further methodological development of consumer participation by a work group of the Patient Forum in coordination with the patient organizations involved. In particular, the procedures resulting from more intensive patient participation in patient guideline development are to be examined as to their relevance for the expansion of patient involvement in NDMG development.
-
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich · Jan 2007
[Social security law and evidence-based health care in Germany].
The present contribution examines whether German Social Security Law requires or allows the German health care system to follow the principles of evidence-based health care. The discussion will be based on the relevant example of statutory health insurance (Book of Social Code V-SGB V). According to Sect. 2 SGB V health care provision has to follow medical standards, acknowledging medical progress. ⋯ The Federal Social Court (Bundessozialgericht, BSG) decided that the decisions of the G-BA could not be challenged for being medically incorrect. In 2005, the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht-BVerfG) decided that a stricter control over the G-BA by the social courts was needed and that in the case of serious disease a lower evidence level might be sufficient. BSG and G-BA will continue to accept the results and methods of Evidence-based Medicine.