Seminars in oncology
-
Seminars in oncology · Oct 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA report comparing the use of tropisetron (Navoban), a 5-HT3 antagonist, with a standard antiemetic regimen of dexamethasone and metoclopramide in cisplatin-treated patients under conditions of severe emesis.
This report of a double-blind, randomized study performed to evaluate the comparative antiemetic efficacy of tropisetron (Navoban; Sandoz Pharma Ltd, Basel, Switzerland), a new 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonist, focuses on treatment during stages of chemotherapy when nausea and vomiting are particularly severe. One hundred fifteen chemotherapy-naive patients with malignant disease were administered either tropisetron (n = 58) or a dexamethasone dose plus a metoclopramide dose (n = 57) during 5 days of two successive cycles of chemotherapy. Within the first 24 hours after receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy, 76% of patients in the tropisetron group remained free of vomiting (with 59% of patients free of nausea) compared with 39% of patients free of vomiting in the conventionally treated group (30% of patients free of nausea). ⋯ The difference in incidence of nausea and vomiting between the patient groups was statistically significant (P < .05). The efficacy of tropisetron was well maintained during the second consecutive chemotherapy cycle; during the first 24 hours, 72% and 62% of patients remained free of vomiting and nausea, respectively. Tropisetron appears to be a highly effective, well tolerated, and simple to use antiemetic agent for patients receiving chemotherapy.
-
Seminars in oncology · Oct 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialPaclitaxel (Taxol)/doxorubicin combinations in advanced breast cancer: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group experience.
Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ), the first taxane to enter routine clinical practice, has aroused considerable interest due to its novel mechanism of action and its significant activity in metastatic breast cancer. Given this activity, it seemed logical to attempt to combine paclitaxel with doxorubicin, the other most active single agent in metastatic breast cancer. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performed two trials investigating paclitaxel/doxorubicin combinations in patients with advanced breast cancer in an attempt to identify a tolerable dose and schedule of the combination. ⋯ This suggests that sequence of drug administration in paclitaxel-based regimens may play an important role as a determinant of toxicity and (perhaps) efficacy, a finding similar to that seen when paclitaxel and cisplatin were combined in patients with ovarian cancer. Based on this study, we identified the sequence of doxorubicin (50 mg/m2) followed by paclitaxel (150 mg/m2) to be the maximum tolerated dose. This combination is currently being compared with paclitaxel alone and doxorubicin alone in patients with advanced breast cancer in an intergroup trial led by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.
-
Seminars in oncology · Oct 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialPrevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting by tropisetron (Navoban) alone or in combination with other antiemetic agents.
We report an open, three-armed, multicenter study being carried out to assess the optimum treatment for acute and delayed emesis and nausea in patients undergoing highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Eighty-seven patients were randomized to receive tropisetron (Navoban; Sandoz Pharma Ltd, Basel, Switzerland), tropisetron plus dexamethasone, or tropisetron plus metoclopramide during chemotherapy. Tropisetron in combination with dexamethasone produced the best control of both acute and delayed emesis. ⋯ In the tropisetron and tropisetron plus metoclopramide treatment groups, a decreased food intake was observed due to delayed nausea while the addition of dexamethasone prevented loss of appetite. The antiemetic treatments were similarly well tolerated. The most common adverse events were constipation (15%) and tiredness (7%).
-
Seminars in oncology · Oct 1994
Multicenter Study Clinical TrialPreliminary results of two dose-finding studies of paclitaxel (Taxol) and carboplatin in non-small cell lung and ovarian cancers: a European Cancer Centre effort.
Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) given as a 24-hour infusion, and carboplatin have activity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and ovarian cancer. Two dose-finding studies were initiated to identify the optimal doses for the paclitaxel/carboplatin combination when paclitaxel is given in a 3-hour infusion. The fact that the pharmacologic interaction between paclitaxel and cisplatin increases the toxicity of paclitaxel when cisplatin is given before it also prompted an investigation of the influence of drug sequence on toxicity and pharmacokinetics in the NSCLC trial. ⋯ No difference in toxicity has been observed thus far between the two drug sequences in the NSCLC study. Both studies are still accruing patients as the maximum tolerated doses of paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin have not yet been reached (carboplatin 300 mg/m2 with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 in the NSCLC study; carboplatin 400 mg/m2 with paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 in the ovarian cancer study). An investigation of maximum tolerated doses with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support is planned thereafter.
-
Seminars in oncology · Oct 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialA phase II study of cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin augmented by vinorelbine (Navelbine) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: rationale and study design.
In a randomized phase II study by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B, the cisplatin/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (PFL) combination produced a 29% response rate in advanced, unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. Vinorelbine (Navelbine; Burroughs Wellcome, Co, Research Triangle Park, NC; Pierre Fabre Médicament, Paris, France), a semisynthetic vinca alkaloid, has also demonstrated single-agent activity in this disease. Therefore, a phase I-II study was designed to investigate the addition of vinorelbine in escalating doses to the PFL combination. ⋯ It was concluded that this dose level was not feasible. During a preliminary analysis, one complete response and three partial responses were observed in 16 patients evaluated; one of these patients had a pathologic complete remission. This early analysis indicates activity for the regimen.