Seminars in oncology
-
Seminars in oncology · Aug 1997
ReviewDocetaxel (Taxotere) for the treatment of anthracycline-resistant breast cancer.
Until the introduction of the taxoids, docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France) and paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Oncology, Princeton, NJ), in the 1990s, anthracyclines were widely recognized as the best single agents for the treatment of breast cancer. However, even when anthracyclines are used in combination regimens with response rates of over 50%, including complete responses in 17% of patients, few women (3%) with metastatic disease remain disease free at 5 years after treatment. The low level of sustained responses is largely due to the phenomenon of drug resistance. ⋯ The overall response rate to docetaxel monotherapy in patients with anthracycline-resistant or refractory metastatic disease has been shown to be 41%. The response rate to first-line docetaxel monotherapy for metastatic breast cancer has been shown to be 61%, suggesting that two thirds of the activity of docetaxel is retained in anthracycline-resistant disease. Treatment with a simultaneous combination of docetaxel and doxorubicin has been found to be very active, with a response rate of 89%, and trials to exploit the lack of cross-resistance between these agents, in sequential regimens and adjuvant therapies, are under way.
-
Seminars in oncology · Aug 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialCarboplatin plus paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy in previously untreated advanced ovarian cancer. German AGO Study Group Ovarian Cancer. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie.
Since publication of the results of the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) III study, the combination of cisplatin and paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) has been adopted widely as the new standard for treating advanced ovarian cancer. Further attempts to optimize first-line chemotherapy with platinum and taxanes include substituting carboplatin for cisplatin, individualizing the carboplatin dose by calculating it according to the area under the concentration-time curve, and reducing the length of the paclitaxel infusion. Attempts to optimize platinum/paclitaxel combinations have led to the initiation of several small phase I/II trials evaluating the carboplatin/paclitaxel combination. ⋯ Retrospective comparison with the GOG results reveals no significant difference in response rates between patients in the cisplatin/paclitaxel arm of GOG III and those in the AGO study: the GOG study reported a 73% response rate, compared with a preliminary 75% response rate in the AGO study, resulting in a relative risk of 1.03 (95% confidence interval, 0.83 to 1.27). Overall, this interim analysis did not reveal any reason to terminate this study early. Accrual is ongoing and is expected to be completed in 1997.
-
Seminars in oncology · Aug 1997
Review Case ReportsSimultaneous paclitaxel and radiotherapy: initial clinical experience in lung cancer and other malignancies.
This report summarizes results from a series of pilot trials using combined-modality chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) as a radiosensitizing agent in patients with cancers of the lung, cervix, and bladder. In a phase I study of paclitaxel/radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, five paclitaxel dose levels were evaluated in conjunction with simultaneous radiation (total dose, 59.4 Gy). A minimum of five patients were treated at each dose level; paclitaxel doses ranged from 45 mg/m2 over 3 weeks (level 1) to 65 mg/m2 for 7 weeks. ⋯ The investigators next conducted a trial of paclitaxel 50 mg/m2 given weekly over 3 hours with the previous carboplatin/radiotherapy regimen in four women and documented two partial responses, one near-complete response, and one minor response, with moderate, manageable toxicity. In a final case report on a patient with recurrent bladder cancer, simultaneous radiotherapy and weekly paclitaxel 50 mg/m2 intravenously over 3 hours yielded a partial remission, prompting the investigators to plan a phase I study to confirm the regimen's efficacy and safety. Additional planned studies include a phase I trial of simultaneous chemoradiotherapy in patients with cancer of the head and neck.
-
Seminars in oncology · Aug 1997
ReviewHigh-dose therapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel in non-small cell lung cancer.
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States. The combination of more active agents like vinorelbine and paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) with cisplatin has led to improved survival for patients with advanced metastatic disease. The ability to escalate the dose of cisplatin-based regimens is limited by nonhematologic toxicities and is especially difficult in the population of patients with advanced NSCLC. ⋯ Depending on response to induction therapy, patients then receive surgical resection, thoracic radiation therapy, or both. This phase II trial will examine clinical and pathologic responses and the toxicity of this high-dose regimen in patients with locally advanced NSCLC. Ultimately, phase III trials will be needed to establish the role of this approach in NSCLC.
-
Seminars in oncology · Aug 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialA randomized study of etoposide and carboplatin with or without paclitaxel in the treatment of small cell lung cancer.
Small cell lung cancer accounts for 20% to 25% of all lung cancer cases and is initially responsive to combination chemotherapy. However, the majority of patients relapse, and at that point their disease is highly resistant to chemotherapy. The combination of etoposide with either cisplatin or carboplatin is regarded as the standard of care for these patients. ⋯ The study compares EP (carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve of 6 intravenously [IV] over 30 to 60 minutes on day 1, with etoposide 120 mg/m2 IV days 1 to 3) versus EP plus paclitaxel (paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV 1-hour infusion on day 1, carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve of 6 IV over 30 to 60 minutes on day 1, and etoposide 50/100 mg orally on alternating days 1 to 10). The design, inclusion criteria, and staging of patients in this study will be presented with initial accrual and patient characteristics. Randomized studies of this type are essential if the true role of this new combination is to be fully evaluated.