Chirurgia italiana
-
Comparative Study
Is sentinel lymph node biopsy more accurate than axillary dissection for staging nodal involvement in breast cancer patients?
Today evaluation of axillary involvement can be routinely performed with the technique of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). One of the greatest advantages of SLNB is the nearly total absence of local postoperative complications. It is important to understand whether SLNB is better than axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND) for staging axillary nodal involvement. ⋯ SLNB with complete examination of the SLN removed can be considered the best method for axillary staging in breast cancer patients with clinical negative nodes. In our study, the percentage of metastases encountered after complete examination of SLN was 45% compared to the accuracy of axillary dissection that was only 25.8%. Moreover, this approach avoids the useless axillary cleaning in about 55-60% of cases, decreasing postoperative morbidity and mortality.
-
We report a case of recurrent abdominal pain due to intermittent caecal volvulus arising in a patient with mesenterium commune. Colonic enema, abdominal CT scan and virtual colonography with three-dimensional colonic reconstruction were useful for detecting this rare abnormal intestinal fixation. Although right hemicolectomy was indicated, we performed a wide colonic resection from the terminal ileum to the distal sigmoid because the patient's short mesentery made it impossible to perform an ileum-transverse anastomosis. At six months follow-up, the patient was in good health and free of abdominal symptoms.
-
The most frightening complication following colorectal surgery is the anastomotic leakage which is associated with an high mortality rate, and the analysis of risk factors for the anastomotic leak is of great interest. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the risk factor for the anastomotic leakage in personal series of patients who underwent colorectal surgery. We have analyzed a consecutive series of 1290 patients who underwent colorectal open surgery from 1970 to 2004. ⋯ Significant factors were: the type of surgery (higher risk after restorative proctocolectomy or rectal resection), the site extra peritoneal of the anastomosis, the type of the anastomosis (higher risk after coloanal or ileal-pouch anal or colorectal), the stapled anastomosis, the intraoperative complications. After colorectal anastomosis the risk of leakage has progressively higher for low, ultra-low and coloanal anastomosis. In these conditions a protective stoma seems to be suitable.
-
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of applying strict selection criteria to patients with symptoms of obstructed defecation, rectocele and rectal prolapse who were candidates for surgery. From June 2001 to September 2003, 20 patients underwent surgery in our clinic for symptomatic rectocele and anorectal prolapse. They were evaluated prospectively using a dedicated questionnaire (KESS), a proctological and gynaecological examination, colpo-cysto-defecography and anorectal manometry before surgery and 6 months postoperatively. ⋯ The average KESS score dropped from 17.65 preoperatively to 5.8 six months after surgery. In the treatment of pelvic floor disease, it is important to evaluate both the uro-gynaecological and the proctological symptoms with the utmost care, obtaining an accurate clinical picture with the aid of dedicated questionnaires and a thorough clinical examination. Evaluation of the effectiveness of surgery for constipation necessarily includes assessing the strength of the indications for surgery, irrespective of the surgical technique adopted, but there is currently no standardised test method for recording and comparing the symptoms of constipation.
-
Comparative Study
Comparison of hemodynamic and respiratory effects of propofol and sevoflurane during carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum in a swine model.
The aim of this study was to compare intraoperative hemodynamic and respiratory parameters using propofol and sevoflurane during laparoscopic surgery in a porcine model. After induction of general anaesthesia in 16 pigs with fentanyl (0.005 mg kg(-1)) followed by propofol (6 mg Kg(-1)), it was maintained with fentanyl (0.01 mg kg(-1)h(-1)) and sevoflurane in O2 in group 1 (G1, n = 8) and fentanyl and propofol (12 mg kg(-1)h(-1)) in group 2 (G2, n = 8). The parameters monitored were heart rate, airway pressure (PAW), arterial and venous blood pressures and arterial blood gas analysis. ⋯ Middle arterial pressure was significantly lower in G1 than G2 at T30 and T60. The base deficit was significantly greater in G1 at T60, T90, T120 and Tpost. In this study propofol assured better hemodynamic and respiratory conditions than sevoflurane during laparoscopy in a porcine model.