The American journal of gastroenterology
-
Am. J. Gastroenterol. · Sep 2014
ReviewThe Use of Opioid Analgesics for Chronic Pain: Minimizing the Risk for Harm.
Chronic noncancer pain is common and consequential, affecting ∼100 million people in the United States alone and costing, when direct and indirect costs are combined, in excess of $635 billion. For certain individuals, opioids may be an effective option for the management of chronic pain; however, a series of critical decisions must be made before prescribing opioids to ensure that their potential benefits and possible risks are appropriately and realistically addressed. A thorough history, physical examination, and appropriate testing, including an assessment of risk for substance abuse, misuse, or addiction, should be conducted in patients who are being considered for opioid therapy. ⋯ Both positive and negative changes over time may necessitate a change in medication. Opioids can be prescribed safely and effectively, and when used with appropriate attention to individual patient characteristics may have a positive impact on pain and function. When contemplating initiation of opioid analgesics, clinicians would do well to make it clear to their patient that they will be prescribed on a trial basis with a clear exit strategy for discontinuing such treatment if there is no clear benefit including lack of analgesia, insurmountable adverse effects, and/or frank misuse or abuse of the prescribed drug.
-
Opioid drugs have powerful antidiarrheal effects and many patients taking these drugs for chronic pain relief experience chronic constipation that can progress to opioid-induced bowel dysfunction. Three classes of opioid receptors are expressed by enteric neurons: μ-, δ-, and κ-opioid receptors (MOR, DOR, and KOR). MOR and DOR couple to inhibition of adenylate cylase and nerve terminal Ca(2+) channels and activation of K(+) channels. ⋯ Tolerance develops to the analgesic effects of opioid receptor agonists but not to the constipating actions. This may be due to differential β-arrestin-2-dependent opioid receptor desensitization and internalization in enteric nerves in the colon compared with the small intestine and in neuronal pain pathways. Further studies of differential opioid receptor desensitization and tolerance in subsets of enteric neurons may identify new drugs or other treatment strategies of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction.
-
Am. J. Gastroenterol. · Sep 2014
Review Meta AnalysisThe effect of fiber supplementation on irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fiber has been used for many years to treat irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). This approach had fallen out of favor until a recent resurgence, which was based on new randomized controlled trial (RCT) data that suggested it might be effective. We have previously conducted a systematic review of fiber in IBS, but new RCT data for fiber therapy necessitate a new analysis; thus, we have conducted a systematic review of this intervention. ⋯ Soluble fiber is effective in treating IBS. Bran did not appear to be of benefit, although we did not uncover any evidence of harm from this intervention, as others have speculated from uncontrolled data.
-
Am. J. Gastroenterol. · Sep 2014
Randomized Controlled TrialGranulocyte colony-stimulating factor in severe alcoholic hepatitis: a randomized pilot study.
Severe alcoholic hepatitis has high short-term mortality. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that treatment of patients with alcoholic hepatitis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) might mobilize bone marrow-derived stem cells and promote hepatic regeneration and thus improve survival. ⋯ G-CSF is safe and effective in the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells and improves liver function as well as survival in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis.
-
Am. J. Gastroenterol. · Sep 2014
Comparative StudyDevelopment, external validation, and comparative assessment of a new diagnostic score for hepatic steatosis.
We used data from population-based studies to determine the accuracy of the Fatty Liver Index (FLI) and the Hepatic Steatosis Index (HSI) in determining individual risk of hepatic steatosis. We also developed a new risk scoring system and validated all three indices using external data. ⋯ We compared the ability of the FLI, HSI, and our own scoring system to determine the risk of hepatic steatosis using two population-based data sets (one for the development of our own system and one for validation). In the development and independent replication data set, all three indices discriminated well between patients with and without hepatic steatosis, but the predicted risks did not match well with the observed risks, when applied to external data. Scoring systems for fatty liver disease could depend on methodological standardization of ultrasound diagnosis and laboratory measurements.