Clinical orthopaedics and related research
-
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. · Apr 1989
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPlates versus external fixation in severe open tibial shaft fractures. A randomized trial.
A prospective study of 59 patients with Grade II or III open tibial shaft fractures compared internal and external fixation. Bony stabilization was with plating by AO principles or with external fixation with the one-half pin technique, prospectively randomized. In 12 cases, minimal internal fixation of the tibia and external fixation were combined. ⋯ Knee and ankle ranges of motion were affected by ipsilateral femoral shaft fracture, knee injury, or ankle and foot trauma but not by the type of fixation. Both methods yielded excellent results, but the rate and extent of complications were lower with external fixation. Therefore, external fixation using the one-half pin technique should be regarded as a primary method of stabilization for Grades II and III open tibial shaft fractures.
-
External fixation has a definite role in the management of pelvic fractures. Biomechanically, it is not useful for maintaining reduction of the unstable, vertically migrating pelvis and must be used with some other form of treatment, such as traction, spica cast, or internal fixation. In vertically stable fractures, that is, rotationally unstable fractures, the anteroposterior and lateral compression injuries, the external fixator should probably be the first course of treatment.
-
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. · Apr 1989
Comparative StudyPlaster cast versus external fixation for unstable intraarticular Colles' fractures.
This study compares 75 consecutive patients with Frykman Type VIII fractures of the distal forearm treated by primary external fixation with 32 patients who sustained similar injuries and were treated by closed reduction and cast immobilization. The latter group of patients served as an historical control. ⋯ All fractures treated with external fixation remained well reduced and aligned, whereas 88% of those treated with casts had unsatisfactory alignment despite the fact that 30% had a second reduction. The external fixator group also had superior results with respect to functional outcome, range of motion, and grip strength.
-
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. · Apr 1989
Comparative StudyA biomechanical analysis of the Ilizarov external fixator.
Five configurations of the Ilizarov fixator were analyzed in vitro. The overall stiffness, shear stiffness, and axial motion of the fracture site were determined. The data were compared with the results of eight conventional one-half frame fixators previously tested in the same manner. ⋯ The overall stiffness and shear rigidity of the Ilizarov external fixator were similar to those of the one-half pin fixators in bending and torsion. The stability of the Ilizarov fixator was a function of bone position within the fixator rings and fixation wire tension. The use of olive stop wires increased the shear resistance of the Ilizarov system.
-
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. · Apr 1989
ReviewThe effect of rigidity on fracture healing in external fixation.
Knowledge of the basic biomechanics of external fixation is necessary to obtain the full benefits of the technique for bone fracture treatment. The rigidity of external fixation, including pin-bone interface stresses, is discussed and bone healing and remodeling under different fixation stiffnesses and fracture gap conditions are described. ⋯ Bone union can be achieved under external fixation through different pathways, ranging from callus-free gap healing under a rigid neutralization configuration to direct-contact healing with periosteal new bone formation under axially dynamized stable fixation. Cortical reconstruction by secondary osteons seems to be important for the ultimate strength of the bone union.