Clinical orthopaedics and related research
-
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. · Jun 2006
Comparative StudyFixation of posterior malleolar fractures provides greater syndesmotic stability.
Syndesmotic injuries are common in ankle fractures. Traditional syndesmosis fixation may be associated with a secondary procedure. When the posterior malleolus is fractured, the posterior syndesmotic ligaments may remain intact and attached to the fragment. ⋯ Compared with the intact specimens, stiffness was restored to 70% after fixation of the posterior malleolus, and to 40% after syndesmosis stabilization. Syndesmotic stability may be obtained more effectively by fixation of the posterior malleolus rather than by using a syndesmotic screw. Although additional clinical investigation is warranted, these concepts may be useful in eliminating syndesmotic screw fixation in select patients.
-
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. · Jun 2006
Comparative StudySurgical treatment of distal clavicle fractures using the clavicular hook plate.
From 1999 to 2003, 34 patients with unstable distal clavicular fractures (Neer Type 2) had surgery using the acromioclavicular titanium hook plate. To investigate the reliability of clavicular hook plate fixation and the effects of hook plates in the subacromial space, we retrospectively reviewed clinical results for pain, shoulder function, range of motion, and radiographic results. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores for shoulder disorders indicated good clinical results (mean, 98.3 points). ⋯ This plate fixation method is useful for treating unstable distal clavicular fracture. However, careful operative planning and familiarity with the technique are necessary to prevent complications including subacromial impingement, rotator cuff damage, acromion fracture, and hook cut-out. Care must be used when establishing the position of the hook hole, and it is best to remove the plate after bony union.
-
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. · Jun 2006
Comparative StudyMisuse of baseline comparison tests and subgroup analyses in surgical trials.
It is unclear whether the misuse of statistical tests that compare patients' baseline characteristics and subgroup analyses in randomized controlled trials can be extrapolated to the surgical literature. We did an observational study evaluating the current use of baseline comparability tests and subgroup analyses in surgical randomized controlled trials. Published surgical randomized controlled trials in four medical journals were identified. ⋯ Forty-nine (91%) analyses were performed post hoc without prior hypotheses. Investigators reported differences between subgroups in 31 (57%) of the analyses, all of which were featured in the summary or conclusion. These inferences may be misleading, making their application to clinical practice unwarranted.
-
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. · Jun 2006
Editorial Comparative StudyTotal hip arthroplasty dislocation: prevention and management: editorial comment.