Journal of clinical periodontology
-
J. Clin. Periodontol. · Dec 2000
Clinical TrialA sedation technique for implant and periodontal surgery.
Evaluation of a sedation technique which involved titrating intravenous midazolam to an 'ideal' sedation end point, followed by a continuous infusion of propofol. This technique might be a satisfactory alternative to general anaesthesia for implant surgery in anxious patients or when procedures exceed 60-min duration. ⋯ The sedation technique described takes advantage of the differing pharmacokinetic properties of midazolam and propofol. Initial sedation was achieved using midazolam, this was then maintained using a variable propofol infusion. The shorter distribution and elimination half-lifes of the latter drug made matching the level of sedation to the patient's needs easier and also provided good short-term recovery.
-
J. Clin. Periodontol. · Sep 2000
Root-dentin sensitivity following non-surgical periodontal treatment.
Little clinical data exist on the incidence and severity by which root dentin sensitivity (RDS) results from periodontal therapy. The aim of the present clinical trial was to study the degree to which a sample of patients requiring non-surgical periodontal treatment develops RDS. ⋯ The data confirm that meticulous plaque control will diminish RDS problems and that scaling and root planing procedures in periodontal therapy result in an increase of teeth that respond to painful stimuli. However, pain experiences in general appeared minor and only a few teeth in a few patients developed highly sensitive root surfaces following instrumentation.
-
J. Clin. Periodontol. · Sep 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialEvaluation of 2 methods to assess gingival bleeding in smokers and non-smokers in natural and experimental gingivitis.
The purpose of the present study was to compare the bleeding tendency as elicited by probing the marginal gingiva (BOMP) and probing to the bottom of the pocket (BOPP) in smokers and non-smokers in natural gingivitis and during experimental gingivitis. 11 smokers (sm) and 14 non-smokers (nsm) were recruited. When they had less than 20% approximal bleeding sites, they entered a 14-day trial period of 'experimental gingivitis'. Subjects returned 30 days later, after resuming normal oral hygiene procedures, for a final gingival assessment. ⋯ Probing to the bottom of the pocket results in significantly more bleeding in gingival health and gingivitis as compared to probing of the marginal gingiva. This shows that evaluation of the gingival condition with BOMP, the method of choice with respect to gingivitis, can be used as a parameter for inflammation when comparing smokers and non-smokers. The suppressed inflammatory response to plaque accumulation, as observed in smokers, indicates that they should be identified as a separate group when they participate as panelists in (experimentally induced) gingivitis studies.
-
J. Clin. Periodontol. · Jan 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effect of a one-stage full-mouth disinfection on different intra-oral niches. Clinical and microbiological observations.
A treatment for periodontal infections often consists of consecutive rootplanings (per quadrant, at a 1- to 2-week interval), without a proper disinfection of the remaining intra-oral niches (untreated pockets, tongue, saliva, mucosa and tonsils). Such an approach, could theoretically lead to a reinfection of previously-treated pockets. The present study aims to examine the effect of a full-mouth disinfection on the microbiota in the above-mentioned niches. ⋯ The full-mouth disinfection resulted in a statistically significant additional reduction/elimination of periodontopathogens, especially in the subgingival pockets, but also in the other niches. These microbiological improvements were reflected in a statistically-significant higher probing depth reduction and attachment gain in the test patients. These findings suggest that a disinfection of all intra-oral niches within a short time span leads to significant clinical and microbiological improvements for up to 4 months.
-
J. Clin. Periodontol. · Oct 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialA short-term clinical study design to investigate the chemical plaque inhibitory properties of mouthrinses when used as adjuncts to toothpastes: applied to chlorhexidine.
The removal of plaque by toothbrushing with toothpaste is the most common form of plaque control in the developed world. However, the use of chemical adjuncts such as mouthrinses is increasing. In practice mouthrinses and toothpaste are used together, however, in many clinical trials, employed to assess mouthrinse activity, toothpaste use is suspended. ⋯ The study suggests that, outside the Hawthorne effect, chlorhexidine rinses would be less effective in reducing plaque when used with toothpaste than when used alone. The methodology could be employed as a screening tool for the evaluation of mouthrinses expected to be used as adjuncts to normal oral hygiene methods. The same could be used to optimise oral hygiene regimens which include the use of mouthrinses.