Kidney international. Supplement
-
There are many controversial results about the influence of acute renal failure (ARF) and renal replacement therapy (RRT) on patient outcome in intensive care units. This retrospective study compared demographics. severity, course, and prognosis of ARF during 36 months (period 1, 1991 through 1993; 128 cases) and 18 months (period 2, 1994 through 1995; 141 cases). Compared with period 1, during period 2 there was a markedly increased incidence of ARF. ⋯ Mortality in patients treated with CRRT was in period 1 and in period 2 higher than mortality in patients treated with intermittent RRT, but these results are biased by a preferred use of CRRT in severely ill patients with an unstable circulatory system. These data suggest that the early onset of RRT reduces the mortality of intensive care unit patients with ARF independent of underlying diseases. An influence of the method of RRT, sex, and age on outcome of patients with ARF could not be proven.
-
Continuous venovenous hemodialysis treatment in critically ill patients after liver transplantation.
Acute renal failure (ARF) in critically ill patients is associated with a high mortality rate. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is now widely used for the treatment of ARF in these critically ill patients. We retrospectively analyzed the role of CRRT as a prognostic parameter in patients receiving a cadaveric liver graft in 1998. ⋯ The necessity for CRRT in patients after liver transplantation correlates with a high risk of death. Thus, more efforts have to be made to prevent renal failure in patients after liver transplantation.
-
While there is clear support for the use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in critically ill acute renal failure patients, there are other illnesses without renal involvement where CRRT might be of value. These include sepsis and other inflammatory syndromes such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and cardiopulmonary bypass where removal of inflammatory mediators by hemofiltration is hypothesized to improve outcome. ⋯ Continuous and therefore smooth fluid removal may improve organ function in ARDS, after surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, and in patients with refractory congestive heart failure. Continuous removal of endogenous toxins, eventually combined with intermittent hemodialysis, is probably beneficial in inborn errors of metabolism, severe lactic acidosis, or tumor lysis syndrome.
-
Review
Use of adsorptive mechanisms in continuous renal replacement therapies in the critically ill.
The pathophysiology of sepsis is becoming a more complicated scenario. In sepsis, endotoxin or other gram-positive derived products induce a complex and dynamic cellular response giving rise to several mediators known to be relevant in the pathogenesis of septic shock, such as specific mediators. substances responsible for up- or down-regulation of cytokine receptors and cytokine antagonists, inactivators of nuclear factor-kappaB or signal transduction pathways, and precursor molecules. ⋯ The rationale is based on the assumption that the nonspecific removal of several mediators of the inflammatory cascade and cytokine network may improve outcome in a rabbit model of septic shock and hemodynamics in a pilot clinical study. The importance of looking for innovative treatments specifically targeted for the special needs of the critically ill patients rather than using concepts and technology applied to the treatment of chronic renal failure is underlined.
-
Review
Is there a role for continuous renal replacement therapies in patients with liver and renal failure?
Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has now been in use for more than a decade in the management of patients with combined renal and hepatic failure. CRRT remains the treatment of choice in this group of critically ill patients because of improved cardiovascular and intracranial stability when compared with conventional intermittent hemofiltration and/or dialysis and effective solute clearances when compared with forms of peritoneal dialysis. ⋯ Whether continuous dialysis or hemofiltration is the mode of treatment choice remains unanswered, with greater amino acid and ammonia losses during dialysis, whereas hemofiltration leads to increased middle molecule and cytokine removal when compared with dialysis, the latter mainly caused by membrane adsorption. Whether the improved cardiovascular stability observed during these techniques is due to the removal of inflammatory mediators or is related to cooling as a consequence of the technique remains to be determined.