Kidney international. Supplement
-
Continuous venovenous hemodialysis treatment in critically ill patients after liver transplantation.
Acute renal failure (ARF) in critically ill patients is associated with a high mortality rate. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is now widely used for the treatment of ARF in these critically ill patients. We retrospectively analyzed the role of CRRT as a prognostic parameter in patients receiving a cadaveric liver graft in 1998. ⋯ The necessity for CRRT in patients after liver transplantation correlates with a high risk of death. Thus, more efforts have to be made to prevent renal failure in patients after liver transplantation.
-
Review
Use of adsorptive mechanisms in continuous renal replacement therapies in the critically ill.
The pathophysiology of sepsis is becoming a more complicated scenario. In sepsis, endotoxin or other gram-positive derived products induce a complex and dynamic cellular response giving rise to several mediators known to be relevant in the pathogenesis of septic shock, such as specific mediators. substances responsible for up- or down-regulation of cytokine receptors and cytokine antagonists, inactivators of nuclear factor-kappaB or signal transduction pathways, and precursor molecules. ⋯ The rationale is based on the assumption that the nonspecific removal of several mediators of the inflammatory cascade and cytokine network may improve outcome in a rabbit model of septic shock and hemodynamics in a pilot clinical study. The importance of looking for innovative treatments specifically targeted for the special needs of the critically ill patients rather than using concepts and technology applied to the treatment of chronic renal failure is underlined.
-
While there is clear support for the use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in critically ill acute renal failure patients, there are other illnesses without renal involvement where CRRT might be of value. These include sepsis and other inflammatory syndromes such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and cardiopulmonary bypass where removal of inflammatory mediators by hemofiltration is hypothesized to improve outcome. ⋯ Continuous and therefore smooth fluid removal may improve organ function in ARDS, after surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, and in patients with refractory congestive heart failure. Continuous removal of endogenous toxins, eventually combined with intermittent hemodialysis, is probably beneficial in inborn errors of metabolism, severe lactic acidosis, or tumor lysis syndrome.
-
While the use of hemofiltration to treat septic shock has potential benefits, the existing studies are difficult to compare because of their variety of inclusion criteria. The concept is to remove the various mediators of severe sepsis and septic shock, such as cytokines and eicosanoids, so that acute renal failure and the resultant multi-organ failure and possible death can be delayed or prevented. The dilemmas include: (a) hemofiltration cannot distinguish between these pro-inflammatory mediators as they are of similar molecular weights, and thus it is difficult to determine which one or combination should be eliminated for the best hemodynamics; (b) timing of the hemofiltration to remove a particular cytokine may make a difference in patient outcome; (c) the most efficacious convection rate of ultrafiltration has not been determined yet; (d) since these mediators quickly saturate the membrane, it should be frequently changed, and thus biocompatibility, availability and costs are added issues; (e) the choice of buffer is different according to the diagnosis of these critically ill patients. Before designing clinical trials, further experimentation is necessary to explore these problems.
-
The anemia of renal failure is caused by the lack of sufficient quantities of endogenous erythropoietin. With the availability of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO), however, it has become apparent that to achieve a given target, hematocrit requires proper management of iron replacement, as well as the administration of rHuEPO. ⋯ Blood loss is less of a problem in patients on peritoneal dialysis, but poor iron intake and increased demand for iron are also seen, the latter in patients receiving rHuEPO. It is essential, therefore, for renal health professionals to understand iron metabolism in dialysis patients in order to properly balance the therapy of renal anemia with rHuEPO and supplemental iron.