The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society
-
Central nervous system lesions cause peripheral dysfunctions currently attributed to central cell death that compromises function of intact peripheral nerves. Injecting quisqualate (QUIS) into the rat spinal cord models spinal cord injury (SCI) and causes at-level scratching and self-injury. Such overgrooming was interpreted to model pain until patients with self-injurious scratching after SCI reported itch motivated scratching that was painless because of sensory loss. Because self-injurious scratching is difficult to explain by central mechanisms alone, we hypothesized that QUIS injections damage peripheral axons of at-level afferents. QUIS was injected into thoracic spinal cords of 18 Long-Evans rats. Animals were killed 3 days after overgrooming began or 14 days after injection. Spinal cord lesions were localized and DRG-immunolabeled for ATF-3. At-level and control skin samples were PGP9.5-immunabeled to quantify axons. Eighty-four percent of QUIS rats overgroomed. Skin in these regions had lost two-thirds of epidermal innervation as compared with controls (P < .001). Rats that overgroomed had 47% less axon-length than nongrooming rats (P = .006). The presence of ATF-3 immunolabeled neurons within diagnosis-related groups of QUIS rats indicated death of afferent cell bodies. Overgrooming after QUIS injections may not be due entirely to central changes. As in humans, self-injurious neuropathic scratching appeared to require loss of protective pain sensations in addition to peripheral denervation. ⋯ This study suggests that intramedullary injection of quisqualic acid in rats causes death of at-level peripheral as well as central neurons. Self-injurious dermatomal scratching that develops in spinal-injured rats may reflect neuropathic itch and loss of protective pain sensations.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Neurophysiology of the cortical pain network: revisiting the role of S1 in subjective pain perception via standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA).
Multiple studies have supported the usefulness of standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) in localizing generators of scalp-recorded potentials. The current study implemented sLORETA on pain event-related potentials, primarily aiming at validating this technique for pain research by identifying well-known pain-related regions. Subsequently, we pointed at investigating the still-debated and ambiguous topic of pain intensity coding at these regions, focusing on their relative impact on subjective pain perception. sLORETA revealed significant activations of the bilateral primary somatosensory (SI) and anterior cingulate cortices and of the contralateral operculoinsular and dorsolateral prefrontal (DLPFC) cortices (P < .05 for each). Activity of these regions, excluding DLPFC, correlated with subjective numerical pain scores (P < .05 for each). However, a multivariate regression analysis (R = .80; P = .024) distinguished the contralateral SI as the only region whose activation magnitude significantly predicted the subjective perception of noxious stimuli (P = .020), further substantiated by a reduced regression model (R = .75, P = .008). Based on (1) correspondence of the pain-activated regions identified by sLORETA with the acknowledged imaging-based pain-network and (2) the contralateral SI proving to be the most contributing region in pain intensity coding, we found sLORETA to be an appropriate tool for relevant pain research and further substantiated the role of SI in pain perception. ⋯ Because the literature of pain intensity coding offers inconsistent findings, the current article used a novel tool for revisiting this controversial issue. Results suggest that it is the activation magnitude of SI, which solely establishes the significant correlation with subjective pain ratings, in accordance with the classical clinical thinking, relating SI lesions to diminished perception of pain. Although this study cannot support a causal relation between SI activation magnitude and pain perception, such relation might be insinuated.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Pregabalin for postherpetic neuralgia: placebo-controlled trial of fixed and flexible dosing regimens on allodynia and time to onset of pain relief.
Time to onset of pain relief and improvement in allodynia in 269 patients with postherpetic neuralgia was examined in a 4-week randomized trial comparing flexibly dosed pregabalin (150-600 mg/d), fixed-dose pregabalin (300 mg/d), and placebo. For each patient with clinically meaningful pain reduction (>or=30%) at end point, onset of pain relief was defined as the first study day on which a patient reported >or=1-point reduction in pain relative to baseline. Average dose achieved was 396 mg/d in the flexible-dose group compared with 295 mg/d in the fixed-dose group. Median pain relief onset times were 3.5 days (flexible-dose), 1.5 days (fixed-dose), and >4 weeks (placebo). Compared with placebo, significantly more patients in both pregabalin treatment groups achieved >or=30% and >or=50% pain reduction at end point. Almost 95% of patients had brush-evoked allodynia, with 68% having moderate to severe allodynia (>or=40/100 mm). At baseline, pain and allodynia were highly correlated. Independent of treatment assignment, improvement in pain and improvement in allodynia were significantly correlated. Allodynia could serve as a useful surrogate outcome measure in future studies. Pregabalin was significantly better than placebo in alleviating allodynia (flexible-dose reduction, 26 mm; fixed-dose, 21 mm; placebo, 12 mm). Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were more frequent in the fixed-dose group. ⋯ A flexible-dose regimen reduces discontinuations, facilitates higher final doses, and results in a slightly greater pain relief. Allodynia (touch-evoked pain) can be of disabling severity and is present in nearly all patients with postherpetic neuralgia. Allodynia severity is correlated with pain severity and improvement in allodynia is correlated with clinical response.
-
Multicenter Study
Trends in use of opioids by noncancer pain type 2000-2005 among Arkansas Medicaid and HealthCore enrollees: results from the TROUP study.
Use of prescription opioids for noncancer pain has increased significantly in recent years, but it is not known if trends differ among the most common noncancer pain conditions. We examined trends in opioid prescribing for the years 2000 through 2005 for individuals with arthritis/joint pain, back pain, neck pain, and headaches by type and number of pain diagnoses, using data from claims records from 2 health insurers: HealthCore commercially insured members (N = 3,768,223) and Arkansas Medicaid (N = 127,866). Rates of headache, back pain, and neck pain diagnoses increased significantly in Arkansas Medicaid enrollees but more modestly among HealthCore enrollees. Rates of opioid use increased in both groups, with long-term use (>90 days' supply per year) increasing at twice the rate of any use. Rates of opioid use did not differ widely between noncancer pain conditions, but long-term opioid use rates doubled with each additional pain diagnosis. Mean days supply and cumulative yearly dose increased between 2000 and 2005 for all pain types and with increasing number of pain diagnoses, but dose per day supply remained relatively stable. The greatest increases in dose among all the pain conditions were seen in short-acting DEA Schedule II opioids. ⋯ This study demonstrates increased use of opioids, particularly long-term use, in noncancer pain over a 6-year period among those with multiple pain types. These results appear to reflect a general increase in use of prescription opioids for noncancer pain rather than a condition-specific change in prescribing practices.
-
Patients often experience hard-to-treat neuropathic pain and other sensations after surgery; consequently, they could develop chronic pain conditions. The phantom limb phenomenon is a well-documented postoperative pain condition. However, phantom phenomena after mastectomies are less documented. The reviews report several views on the prevalence of breast phantoms and coexisting distress. Researchers observed that new methodological approaches might facilitate further research of these issues. This prospective, qualitative study used semistructured interviews to acquire knowledge of if and how phantom breast phenomena appear within the range of other postmastectomy symptoms and sensations. The study revealed that a phantom breast could be difficult to describe and position spatially. The phantom breast phenomenon varied from classic phantom extremity phenomenon and did not seem to cause much distress. However, it proved to be a phenomenon so unknown and different that there is urgent need for more knowledge. This study highlights the importance of further investigation regarding how information and communication related to a phantom breast might be developed. ⋯ The phantom breast is only one piece of a complicated puzzle. Because it was relatively unknown for the women in the study, it is important that analyses of this phenomenon, as a part of a postmastectomy syndrome, be conducted in a dialogue with the patients, by scientifically using qualitative methods.