The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society
-
Review Meta Analysis
Assay Sensitivity of Pain Intensity Versus Pain Relief in Acute Pain Clinical Trials: ACTTION Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
The magnitude of the effect size of an analgesic intervention can be influenced by several factors, including research design. A key design component is the choice of the primary endpoint. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the assay sensitivity of 2 efficacy paradigms: pain intensity (calculated using summed pain intensity difference [SPID]) and pain relief (calculated using total pain relief [TOTPAR]). A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify acute pain studies that calculated both SPIDs and TOTPARs within the same study. Studies were included in this review if they were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled investigations involving medications for postsurgical acute pain and if enough data were provided to calculate TOTPAR and SPID standardized effect sizes. Based on a meta-analysis of 45 studies, the mean standardized effect size for TOTPAR (1.13) was .11 higher than that for SPID (1.02; P = .01). Mixed-effects meta-regression analyses found no significant associations between the TOTPAR - SPID difference in standardized effect size and trial design characteristics. Results from this review suggest that for acute pain studies, utilizing TOTPAR to assess pain relief may be more sensitive to treatment effects than utilizing SPID to assess pain intensity. ⋯ The results of this meta-analysis suggest that TOTPAR may be more sensitive to treatment effects than SPIDs are in analgesic trials examining acute pain. We found that standardized effect sizes were higher for TOTPAR compared to SPIDs.
-
Using a simple approach for coding pain severity, the present study describes self-reported pain in U.S. adults. Data are included for 8,781 adults who completed the Functioning and Disability Supplement of the 2012 National Health Interview Survey. An internationally piloted pain severity coding system was used to group participants into 5 discrete ordered pain categories based on their pain persistence (days with pain in the last 3 months) and bothersomeness (little, a lot, somewhere in between): pain free and categories 1 (low) to 4 (high). It is estimated that 126.1 million adults reported some pain in the previous 3 months, with 25.3 million adults (11.2%) suffering from daily (chronic) pain and 23.4 million (10.3%) reporting a lot of pain. Based on the persistence and bothersomeness of their pain, 14.4 million adults (6.4%) were classified as having the highest level of pain, category 4, with an additional 25.4 million adults (11.3%) experiencing category 3 pain. Individuals with category 3 or 4 pain were likely to have worse health status, to use more health care, and to suffer from more disability than those with less severe pain. Associations were seen between pain severity and selected demographic variables including race, ethnicity, preferred language, sex, and age. ⋯ U.S. estimates of pain prevalence are presented using a simple approach for assigning pain severity developed by the Washington Group on Disability Statistics. Concurrent validity is assessed. Although this approach is promising, additional work is required to determine the usefulness of the Washington Group pain categories for pain research or clinical practice.
-
Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a common condition that can significantly affect the quality of life. Contact with allergens results in delayed hypersensitivity reactions involving T lymphocytes, with associated skin inflammation and spontaneous itch and nociceptive sensations. However, psychophysical studies of these sensations are lacking. In the present study, we sensitized 8 healthy volunteers to squaric acid dibutyl ester (SADBE). Two weeks later, 1 volar forearm was challenged with SADBE, and the other with acetone vehicle control. Subsequently, participants rated the maximal perceived intensity of spontaneous itch, pricking/stinging, and burning every 6 to 12 hours for 1 week, using the generalized Labeled Magnitude Scale. In the laboratory, they judged stimulus-evoked sensations within and outside the chemically treated area. The SADBE- but not the acetone-treated skin resulted in 1) localized inflammation, with spontaneous itch and nociceptive sensations peaking at 24 to 48 hours after challenge, 2) alloknesis, hyperknesis, and hyperalgesia to mechanical stimuli that were reduced or eliminated by anesthetic cooling of the SADBE-treated area and restored on rewarming, suggesting that sensations and dysesthesias are dependent on ongoing peripheral neural activity, and 3) enhanced itch to intradermal injection of histamine, BAM8-22, or β-alanine. This experimental model of T-cell-mediated inflammation may prove useful in evaluating potential treatments of itch from ACD. ⋯ In a model of allergic contact dermatitis, experimentally applied in humans, psychophysical measurements were obtained of persistent, spontaneous itch and enhanced stimulus-evoked itch and pain sensations. These sensory measurements will be useful in the identification of the neural mechanisms underlying inflammatory itch and pain.