The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society
-
There is a paucity of understanding about how language influences pain communication and outcomes for families who speak languages other than English in the United States. This is of great importance because 21.6% (68 million) of the population speak a language other than English, with 8% (25 million) of the population speaking English "less than very well." Thus, the aim of this paper is to present a narrative review that describes how spoken language influences pediatric pain assessment and outcomes for children who speak languages other than English and discuss hypothesized factors that contribute to pain disparities in hospital settings. Results from the narrative review reveal that children and families who speak languages other than English have disparate pain outcomes compared with children from English-speaking families. ⋯ Thus, improved understanding of pain concepts and pain communication processes that center individual, interpersonal, cultural, and systemic factors will enable future research to design interventions that enhance culturally relevant pain assessment and management for families who speak languages other than English. PERSPECTIVE: This article summarizes factors that contribute to pain disparities for children who speak languages other than English. Hypothesized factors that contribute to pain disparities for language other than English-speaking children and families include clinician bias, misunderstanding of pain concepts, and lack of access to interpretation services.
-
Inadequately managed pain has immense negative impacts on children, families, health care systems, and societies. Historically and presently, inadequately treated pain disproportionally affects marginalized communities. Deficiencies in pain education for health care providers are widely recognized as a leading contributor to poorly managed pain. ⋯ Additional research is needed to examine impacts of the curriculum on health care provider knowledge and behavior (eg, clinical decision-making) and patient-reported outcomes as well as to test dissemination and implementation strategies. PERSPECTIVE: We present the development and evaluation of a curriculum for health care professionals to combat racial injustice in pain management. By engaging diverse community partners, using design thinking, applying an antiracist lens, and designing for dissemination, we aim to equip the next generation of providers to deliver equitable pain care.
-
Biomedical and clinical research has traditionally focused on binary sex assignments as opposed to gender identity. This oversight has resulted in other gender minority populations being understudied. As a result, there is limited literature on chronic pain and mental health in transgender populations. ⋯ Therefore, it is crucial to include transgender individuals, as well as other gender minority people, in research in order to fully understand the impact of gender minority status on pain and quality of life. PERSPECTIVE: This review explores the intersectional impact of stress and mental health on chronic pain development and the unequal risk for transgender individuals. Promoting inclusion of gender minority individuals in research is a critical step to understanding the factors contributing to minority stress.
-
Socioeconomic disadvantage contributes to health inequities, including chronic pain. Yet, research examining socioeconomic disadvantage and pain risk in Native Americans (NAs) is scant. This exploratory analysis assessed relationships between socioeconomic position (SEP), ethnicity, and neighborhood disadvantage on pronociceptive processes in 272 healthy, chronic pain-free NAs (n = 139) and non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs, n = 133) from the Oklahoma Study of Native American Pain Risk (OK-SNAP). ⋯ PERSPECTIVE: This study assessed neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and pronociceptive processes in chronic pain-free Native Americans (NAs) and non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs). Irrespective of ethnicity, greater neighborhood disadvantage predicted less descending inhibition of spinal nociception. Neighborhood disadvantage was associated with a marker of C-fiber impairment (higher warm detection threshold) in NAs only.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Bystander Acknowledgment Mitigates the Psychological and Physiological Pain of Racial Discrimination for Black Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Racism increases pain sensitization and contributes to racialized pain inequities; however, research has not tested interventions targeting racism to reduce pain. In this study, we examined whether White bystanders can act to mitigate racism's pain-sensitizing effects. To simulate racial exclusion in the laboratory, Black young adults (age 18-30; N = 92) were randomly assigned to be included or excluded by White players in a ball-tossing game (Cyberball). ⋯ We demonstrate that acute exposure to mild racism increases acute pain sensitization. Results suggest that a bystander acknowledging witnessed racism can buffer the acute sensitizing effects of racism on pain, pointing to the potential of interpersonal interventions targeting racism. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT06113926.