Clinical breast cancer
-
Clinical breast cancer · Jun 2019
Examining Associations of Racial Residential Segregation With Patient Knowledge of Breast Cancer and Treatment Receipt.
The effect of racial residential segregation on breast cancer treatment disparities is unclear. We examined whether racial segregation is associated with adjuvant treatment receipt and patient knowledge of disease. ⋯ We did not find clear associations for racial residential segregation and treatment or cancer knowledge in Northern California, an area with low levels of segregation. Additional research should assess the effect of segregation on breast cancer treatment disparities in a variety of geographical locations.
-
Clinical breast cancer · Jun 2019
Impact of Subtype on Survival of Young Patients With Stage IV Breast Cancer.
Although younger age is a negative prognostic factor for patients with early stage breast cancer, data regarding the outcomes of young patients with stage IV disease are limited. We evaluated differences in overall survival (OS) according to age and disease subtype among patients with stage IV breast cancer. ⋯ Compared with those aged 40 to 59 years, patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer aged < 40 years experienced significantly longer survival, except in the setting of triple-negative disease. Distinct treatment-related or biological factors may exist between earlier stage and metastatic breast cancers; further examination of the potential reasons for our findings are warranted.
-
Clinical breast cancer · Jun 2019
Comparative StudyFulvestrant 500 mg Versus Exemestane in Postmenopausal Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer Resistant to Adjuvant Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitors in Clinical Practice: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Fulvestrant 500 mg and exemestane are widely used agents in first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (ER+) postmenopausal MBC after failure of adjuvant nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) treatment. Although fulvestrant 250 mg had similar efficacy compared with exemestane (Evaluation of Faslodex versus Exemestane Clinical Trial study) and fulvestrant 500 mg was superior to fulvestrant 250 mg (Comparison of FASLODEX In Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer study), no direct comparison between fulvestrant 500 mg and exemestane has been conducted. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of fulvestrant 500 mg and exemestane in daily practice. ⋯ Fulvestrant 500 mg showed better efficacy than exemestane in first-line therapy for MBC of ER+ postmenopausal women after failure of adjuvant NSAI treatment. For patients with visceral metastasis or primary endocrine resistance, both treatments showed poor outcomes, indicating a need for further alternatives (targeted therapy or chemotherapy). Both agents were well tolerated in terms of toxicities.
-
Clinical breast cancer · Jun 2019
Clinical TrialEvaluation of a Retroglandular Oncoplastic Technique as a Standard Level I Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Retrospective Clinicopathologic Study of 102 Patients With Breast Cancer.
This study presents a novel Level I oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery technique for performing tumorectomy by retroglandular exploration through a skin incision made in the inferior mammary fold. ⋯ Retroglandular oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery is a novel, effective Level I oncoplastic technique for radical resection of breast tumors ≤ 3 cm in size. Additional advantages include the preservation of natural breast shape, the safety of the technique, and the lack of a need for contralateral symmetrization.