Pain physician
-
Chronic low back pain and obesity are two common medical conditions. Obesity has been associated with symptoms such as adverse fat distribution and multiple secondary disorders, including low back pain. Obesity is defined as being 30% over ideal weight, which influences normal body mechanics as well as recovery from an injury. ⋯ The results showed that the prevalence rate of facet joint pain in chronic low back pain in Group I or nonobese patients was 36%, in contrast to 40% in Group II, or the obese patient group, with no significant differences among the two groups. The study also showed a false-positive rate of 39% in the total sample, or 44% in Group I nonobese patients and 33% in Group II, or obese patients. It is concluded that the prevalence of lumbar facet joint mediated pain of 40% in obese patients and 36% in patients of normal weight with a false-positive rate of 33% in obese patients and 44% in nonobese patients is similar to the results of multiple previous studies concluding that facet joint mediated pain is a common occurrence in obese patients; however, the incidence of facet joint mediated pain is similar in obese patients and nonobese patients.
-
Epidural fibrosis with chronic low back pain, nonresponsive to traditional measures of treatment including surgery, is a common entity in modern medicine. Traditionally, epidural steroid injections have been employed to treat chronic low back pain and radiculopathy associated with failed back surgery. Due to the poor effectiveness of epidural steroid injections in post lumbar laminectomy syndrome, epidural adhesiolysis was introduced in the early 1980s. ⋯ Transforaminal ventral epidural adhesiolysis was performed on an outpatient basis in all patients. The results showed 93% improvement initially, which decreased to 71% at 1 month, 57% at 3 months, 43% at 6 months and 21% at 1 year. The results of this case study show that ventral epidural lysis of adhesions with hypertonic saline neurolysis is safe and effective in managing chronic low back and lower extremity pain in patients who failed to respond to other conservative modalities of treatments, including fluoroscopically directed transforaminal epidural steroid injections.
-
Spinal endoscopy with epidural adhesiolysis is an interventional pain management technique which emerged during the 1990s. It is an invasive but important treatment modality in managing chronic low back pain that is nonresponsive to other modalities of treatment, including percutaneous spring guided adhesiolysis and transforaminal epidural injections. ⋯ Percutaneous endoscopic lysis of epidural scar tissue has been shown to be cost effective and a safe modality. This review discusses various aspects of endoscopic adhesiolysis, including clinical effectiveness, complications, rationale, and indications.
-
Biochemical mechanisms to explain pain generation began relatively recently. Evaluating pain originating from the spine can be challenging because no historical or physical examination findings are sufficiently sensitive or specific for identifying each of the myriad of potential pain generators. These discrete anatomic structures include the nerve root, disc annulus, posterior longitudinal ligament, sacroiliac joint, and facet joint. ⋯ However, this test may not be necessary in the patient when the specific radiculopathy level diagnosis is apparent; this is the case when a characteristic history and physical examination have a corroborative single-level imaging lesion. Determining which level is generating symptoms has implications for subsequent physical therapy, therapeutic injections, and surgery. This review of selective nerve root blocks describes the relevant anatomy, pathophysiology, rationale, clinical utility, and complications.
-
Recent reports of provocative discography not only instill confusion, but also create numerous questions about its value in evaluating low back pain. It was reported that provocative discography produced pain in patients who were not suffering with low back pain but suffering with somatization disorder and depression. This study was designed to evaluate 50 randomly assigned patients, with 25 patients in Group I without somatization disorder and 25 patients in Group II with diagnosis of somatization disorder. ⋯ Any other response, with or without pain, was considered negative. Results showed positive provocative discography in 46% of the patients in the somatization group compared to 54% in the non-somatization group; in 46% of patients with depression compared to 54% of patients without depression; in 15 of 30 patients with generalized anxiety disorder; in 11 of 20 patients without generalized anxiety disorder; and in 42% of patients with combined somatization and depression, with negative discography in 58% of the patients. It is concluded that provocative discography provides similar results in patients with or without somatization, with or without depression, with somatization but with or without depression or with other combinations of the psychological triad of somatization disorder, depression, and generalized anxiety disorder.