Pain physician
-
To demonstrate the effectiveness of Sarapin in prolonging the action of neural blockade with improved pain relief. ⋯ This prospective, double-blind trial of 500 patients undergoing 828 treatments, one time with Sarapin and a subsequent time without, with each patient acting as their own control, showed no significant differences in the pain relief or duration of significant relief with the addition of Sarapin.
-
To evaluate the pattern and flow of epidural contrast in fluoroscopically guided lumbar interlaminar steroid injections. ⋯ Thirty six percent of the injections observed in the study revealed ventral contrast flow. Bilateral contrast flow occurred in 16% of the injections. Caudad contrast flow is less than cephalad. The observed contrast flows need to be studied clinically to determine if this can affect clinical outcome.
-
To evaluate accuracy of needle placement and flow patterns of fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injections. ⋯ Caudal epidural injections are ideally performed with fluoroscopic guidance as the gold standard for accurate needle placement. However, this does not assure either targeted delivery or accurate placement of the drug.
-
Spinal surgery, particularly spinal fusion surgery, alters the anatomy of the spine and hence, may increase the difficulty of performing an interventional spine procedure. Transforaminal epidural procedures have gained popularity as an alternative to interlaminar epidural steroids in the management of radicular pain syndromes. ⋯ When included, however, patients with FBSS have typically undergone laminectomies or microdiscectomies: these procedures are less likely to violate the foraminal space in the spine compared to fusion surgery. We describe the specific details of a transforaminal approach to the epidural space/spinal nerve in a patient with a posterolateral and posterior interbody fusion.
-
This was a pilot study to test the potential effectiveness of intradiscal restorative injection therapy and compare with intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET). Thirty-five patients for intradiscal injection and seventy-four for IDET took part in the study. All patients had intractable chronic discogenic low back pain, confirmed by discogram study. ⋯ However, the duration of pain flare-up was notably shorter for restorative injections (8.6 days) than for IDET (33.1 days). Biochemical intradiscal restorative injections may be useful to reduce pain and disability in patients with chronic discogenic low back pain, and have clinically similar efficacy to IDET, but with improved cost-benefit ratio. The results of this study indicate that controlled random prospective comparative studies need to be performed to establish the efficacy of this treatment.