Pain physician
-
Over the years, there has been a shift toward the increased reliance on opioids for the treatment of chronic pain. It is well known that some patients do not provide an appropriate history or underestimate their drug intake, and may exaggerate reported pain levels. Numerous studies have documented the incidence of illicit drug use and abuse of opioids in chronic pain patients. It is not known what proportion of patients have already been exposed to controlled substances prior to presenting for interventional pain management. ⋯ Ninety percent of these patients were taking opioids. Twenty-seven patients incorrectly reported opioid use, either underuse or overuse, with 23 patients using illicit drugs, 12 using non-prescription opioids, and with 35 of 100 patients at initial evaluation exhibiting one of the abuse behaviors.
-
Interventional pain management has been growing by leaps and bounds with the introduction of an array of new CPT codes, the expansion of interventional techniques, and utilization. Interventional pain management dates back to the origin of neural blockade and regional analgesia, in 1884. Over the years, pain medicine and interventional pain management have taken many approaches, including biological, biopsychosocial, and psychosocial. ⋯ Overall, the utilization of various nerve blocks (excluding epidurals, disc injections, and facet joint blocks) in Medicare recipients from 1998 to 2003 were performed approximately 50% of the time by non-pain physicians. Interventional pain management is growing rapidly, under the watchful eye of the government, and third party payors. Establishing an algorithmic approach and following guidelines may improve compliance and quality of care without implications of abuse.
-
Lumbar facet (zygapophysial) joints have been implicated as the source of chronic pain in 15% to 45% of patients with chronic low back pain. Diagnosis may be confounded by false-positive results with a single diagnostic block and administration of anxiolytics and narcotics prior to or during the diagnostic facet joint blocks. ⋯ The administration of sedation with midazolam or fentanyl is a confounding factor in the diagnosis of lumbar facet joint pain in patients with chronic low back pain. However, this study suggests that if strict criteria including pain relief and ability to perform prior painful movements is used as the standard for evaluating the effect of controlled local anesthetic blocks, the diagnostic validity of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks may be preserved.
-
Epidural steroid injections (ESI) are commonly used in managing radicular pain. The risk of complications with epidural steroids is small, with the majority of complications being non-specific. Flushing is a known side effect of corticosteroid administration. The occurrence of flushing after epidural steroids has not been studied prospectively. ⋯ Flushing reaction appears to be more widespread than previously assumed, with an overall incidence of 11%. There was no significant difference in self-reported flushing reactions following lumbar epidural steroid injections using either betamethasone or methylprednisolone.
-
Two major portals are available for delivery of medication into the cervical epidural space: interlaminar and transforaminal. The choice of which approach to use is commonly made by assessing the patient's structural pathology, one's skill in performing each procedure, and then weighing the advantages versus the risk associated with the particular technique. Over the past several years, a growing number of cases involving serious complications following cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections have led some to question the safety of the procedure and to preferentially perform interlaminar epidural injections. ⋯ When performed by experienced interventionalists, major complications are probably rare and it could take years for a significant complication to occur. We must however all be aware that these complications can occur.