Pain physician
-
The importance to physicians of maintaining a level of understanding of illnesses and their treatment continues to reveal itself in a most striking fashion when it comes to the progressive interest recently directed to disorders of the autonomic nervous system (ANS). In particular, the relevance to pain practitioners of disease states which directly involve the sympathetic portion of the ANS has increased markedly following the international renaming of reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD) and causalgia to complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) Type I and Type II respectively, as well as sympathetically maintained pain (SMP). Subsequently it has become better understood that many other forms of neuropathic pain also demonstrate local abnormalities of the sympathetic nervous supply to the skin within the painful territory, thereby increasing the diagnostic value of these (often subtle) cutaneous clinical signs. ⋯ Methods used in the preparation of this article have included a review of (a) historic clinical and laboratory articles (or translations thereof) regarding the medical importance of disorders of the autonomic nervous system, dating back to more than 155 years ago (b) anatomic and electrophysiological basis for electroneurodiagnostic sudomotor testing, and (c) the author's proposal for a diagnostic classification of regional sympathetic sudomotor dysfunction.
-
Although established as a field of specialization, pain medicine remains somewhat fractionated. Such lack of cohesion creates dissonance on multiple levels, and thus, impedes the provision of effective pain care. ⋯ The intricate relationship between pain, the pain patient, and the pain physician creates pragmatic and moral dilemmas that may not be well served by the use of prima facie principles. It is argued that an agent-based, virtue ethics best enable the clinician to both apprehend the complexity of this relationship and appreciate other ethical approaches in the discourse arising from issues of care.
-
The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is a putative source of low back pain. The objective of this article is to provide clinicians with a concise review of SIJ structure and function, diagnostic indicators of SIJ-mediated pain, and therapeutic considerations. The SIJ is a true diarthrodial joint with unique characteristics not typically found in other diarthrodial joints. ⋯ Conservative management includes manual medicine techniques, pelvic stabilization exercises to allow dynamic postural control, and muscle balancing of the trunk and lower extremities. Interventional treatments include sacroiliac joint, intra-articular joint injections, radiofrequency neurotomy, prolotherapy, cryotherapy, and surgical treatment. The evidence for intra-articular injections and radiofrequency neurotomy has been shown to be limited in managing sacroiliac joint pain.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
The effect of sedation on diagnostic validity of facet joint nerve blocks: an evaluation to assess similarities in population with involvement in cervical and lumbar regions (ISRCTNo: 76376497).
Zygapophysial or facet joint pain in patients suffering with chronic spinal pain without disc herniation or radiculopathy may be diagnosed with certainty by the use of controlled diagnostic blocks. But, in patients suffering with either lumbar or cervical facet joint pain, even this diagnostic approach may be confounded by false-positives when using a single diagnostic block. It may also be confounded by the administration of anxiolytics and narcotics prior to, or during, the controlled diagnostic facet joint blocks. The effect of sedation on the validity and potential differential results in patients suffering with combined cervical and lumbar facet joint pain has not been evaluated. ⋯ Perioperative administration of sodium chloride, midazolam, or fentanyl can confound results in the diagnosis of combined cervical and lumbar facet joint pain. False-positive results with placebo or sedation may be seen in a small proportion of patients.
-
Review Practice Guideline
Opioid guidelines in the management of chronic non-cancer pain.
Opioid abuse has increased at an alarming rate. However, available evidence suggests a wide variance in the use of opioids, as documented by different medical specialties, medical boards, advocacy groups, and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). ⋯ These guidelines evaluated the evidence for the use of opioids in the management of chronic non-cancer pain and recommendations for management. These guidelines are based on the best available scientific evidence and do not constitute inflexible treatment recommendations. Because of the changing body of evidence, this document is not intended to be a "standard of care."