Pain physician
-
The clinical management of spinal hemangiomas and osteolytic metastases involving the upper cervical spine (C1-C3) is challenging. Symptoms vary from simple vertebral pain to progressive neurological deficits. Surgery and radiotherapy have been the treatment options for years. Surgery, however, can result in complications, such as hemorrhage, and may be counter-indicated when the treatment goal is primarily palliative due to multiple metastases, an unfavorable prognosis and/or a poor performance state. On the other hand, radiotherapy carries the risk of inducing secondary sarcomas or producing radionecrosis. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) was recently introduced as an alternative for treating patients in whom surgery and radiotherapy are counter-indicated. As of yet, there are few PVP case reports. ⋯ The safety and efficacy of CT-guided PVP using a translateral approach via the space between the carotid sheath and vertebral artery were demonstrated in patients with hemangioma or metastasis in the upper cervical spine. CT-guided PVP via a translateral approach should become a treatment option for such patients.
-
Facial pain occurring after traumatic injury of the facial branches of the trigeminal nerve is a medical condition that is often very difficult to treat. Patients are quite disabled by their symptoms and most therapies are ineffective in relieving this pain. Peripheral nerve stimulation has been used as a treatment to provide pain relief for this type of intractable atypical facial pain. ⋯ This surgical technique for placing peripheral nerve stimulators allows for a minimally invasive approach for the treatment of intractable posttraumatic trigeminal neuralgia with potentially less risk of facial nerve damage. This case confirms the need for further studies to be done in the future to prove the safety and effectiveness of this technique.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Results of 2-year follow-up of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of fluoroscopic caudal epidural injections in central spinal stenosis.
Lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the most common causes of low back pain among older adults and can cause significant disability. Despite its prevalence, there is a paucity of literature concerning the treatment of spinal stenosis symptoms. Multiple interventions, including surgery and interventional techniques such as epidural injections and adhesiolysis, are commonly utilized in managing pain related to central spinal stenosis. However, there is a paucity of literature from randomized, controlled trials about the effectiveness of epidural injections for lumbar central spinal stenosis. ⋯ Caudal epidural injections of local anesthetic with or without steroids provide relief in a modest proportion of patients undergoing the treatment and may be considered as an effective treatment for a select group of patients who have chronic function-limiting low back and lower extremity pain secondary to central spinal stenosis.
-
Multicenter Study
Ziconotide adverse events in patients with cancer pain: a multicenter observational study of a slow titration, multidrug protocol.
Ziconotide is a new analgesic agent administered intrathecally. It is challenging to use and can induce several and sometimes serious adverse events. A low initial dosage followed by slow titration may reduce serious adverse events. ⋯ The rates of minor and moderate adverse events were consistent with previous reports. However, the rate of serious adverse events was substantially lower. Our study confirms the efficacy of intrathecal analgesia with ziconotide for relieving refractory cancer pain. These results indicate that multimodal intrathecal analgesia in patients with cancer pain should include ziconotide from the outset in order to provide time for subsequent slow titration.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Unreliability of the visual analog scale in experimental pain assessment: a sensitivity and evoked potentials study.
Pain is a universal but subjective experience, making it difficult to obtain objective information about the experiential dimensions of pain. Although the visual analog scale (VAS) is ubiquitously used in pain assessment, its reliability has been questioned. The properties of this rating scale, especially its anchor points likely to be reinterpreted by subjects, may bias the results. ⋯ Taken together, our psychophysical and SEP results suggest that healthy individuals reinterpret the "no pain" anchor on the classical pain-VAS commonly used in the experimental assessment of pain, by rating the intensity of the stimulation rather than pain perception.