Pain physician
-
This was a pilot study to test the potential effectiveness of intradiscal restorative injection therapy and compare with intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET). Thirty-five patients for intradiscal injection and seventy-four for IDET took part in the study. All patients had intractable chronic discogenic low back pain, confirmed by discogram study. ⋯ However, the duration of pain flare-up was notably shorter for restorative injections (8.6 days) than for IDET (33.1 days). Biochemical intradiscal restorative injections may be useful to reduce pain and disability in patients with chronic discogenic low back pain, and have clinically similar efficacy to IDET, but with improved cost-benefit ratio. The results of this study indicate that controlled random prospective comparative studies need to be performed to establish the efficacy of this treatment.
-
Bleeding risk in interventional pain practice: assessment, management, and review of the literature.
The rarity of published bleeding complications with respect to the practice of interventional pain medicine suggests two possibilities: techniques are being performed in a manner to minimize bleeding or the process of hemostasis is very forgiving. Hence, bleeding complications may increase if techniques are not performed with due skill or if the process of hemostasis is impaired. Interventional pain physicians may be well acquainted with the technical aspects of procedures, but the degree of their expertise in the field of coagulation is unclear. ⋯ This manuscript will present a tool to help stratify the risk of bleeding with specific techniques and specific hemostatic abnormalities. The Overall Risk of Significant Bleeding score may help interventional pain practitioners in their individualized assessment of bleeding risk. If used collectively, this tool may help improve patient safety and data collection, with respect to bleeding complications.
-
Knowledge of the relationship of the lumbar sympathetic chain to the vertebral bodies is needed to perform sympathetic block and sympatholysis. This information should be correlated with fluoroscopy to determine the best method to perform this technique clinically. Twenty cadavers were dissected to demonstrate the lumbar sympathetic chain. ⋯ Use of at least two needles is advisable (L2 and L3 vertebral body). Care should be taken to avoid the lumbar vessels. A transdiscal technique recently advocated may also avoid some of the complications with the paramedian technique, but chances of discitis, nerve root injury, accelerated disc degeneration, disc herniation and rupture of the anterior annulus have to be considered when using this technique.
-
Plasma Beta endorphin (BE) is an endogenous peptide opioid derived form pro-opiomelanocortin. Although the role of plasma BE in pain regulation is unclear, plasma BE levels have been reported to correlate inversely with pain levels in cancer pain. ⋯ Plasma BE levels increased with improved pain control in patients with upper abdominal gastrointestinal malignancies. Although the role of plasma BE in pain pathophysiology is unclear, it appears that pain relief per se, and not the analgesic technique, modulates plasma BE levels. This suggests that plasma BE levels may serve as an objective measure of cancer pain severity and corroborate the patient's report of pain relief.
-
Facet (zygapophysial) joint pain can be diagnosed by anesthetization of the medial branch divisions of the dorsal rami. In accordance with the criteria established by the International Association for the Study of Pain, lumbar facet (zygapophysial) joints have been implicated as the source of chronic pain in 15% to 45% of the patients with chronic low back pain. The reasons for the wide variations have not been systematically evaluated. ⋯ A false-positive rate of 17% in patients with low back pain only and 21% in patients with involvement of multiple regions of the spine was demonstrated with single blocks. This study demonstrated a lower incidence of facet joint pain in patients with spinal pain of a single region in the low back compared to the patients with multiple region involvement of the spine (21% vs 41%), in an interventional pain management setting. These results may not be extrapolated to the general population or chronic low back pain population at large.