European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology
-
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol · Jan 1993
Cardiorespiratory response at the onset of passive leg movements during sleep in humans.
To examine the ventilatory response at the onset of passive leg movements during sleep in man and the concomitant changes in cardiac output (Qc), five healthy male subjects had their knee joints extended and flexed alternately at a frequency of about 60.min-1 for about 8 s. Minute ventilation (VI), respiratory frequency, tidal volume, end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide and of oxygen, stroke volume (SV), heart rate (fc) and Qc were measured before, during and after passive leg movement during sleep stage III or IV (SLEEP). These values were compared with those of the awake condition (AWAKE). ⋯ Four of the five subjects showed a larger increase in ventilation during SLEEP compared with AWAKE. The fc increased significantly (P < 0.05) at the beginning of the passive movement in all cases, while SV showed an increase or decrease so that Qc showed no significant change in either condition. These results would suggest that afferent drive from moving limbs could produce an increase in ventilation without any change in Qc.
-
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol · Jan 1993
Responses of intra-abdominal pressure and abdominal muscle activity during dynamic trunk loading in man.
The purpose of this study was to determine and compare interactions between the abdominal musculature and intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) during controlled dynamic and static trunk muscle loading. Myoelectric activity was recorded in six subjects from the rectus abdominis, obliquus externus, obliquus internus, transversus abdominis and erector spinae muscles using surface and intra-muscular fine-wire electrodes. The IAP was recorded intra-gastrically. ⋯ For single trunk flexions with friction loading, IAP was higher than that seen in extension conditions and increased with added resistance. For inertial loading during trunk flexion, IAP showed two peaks, the larger first peak matched peak forward acceleration and general abdominal muscle activation, while the second corresponded to peak deceleration and was accompanied by activity in transversus abdominis and erector spinae muscles. It was apparent that different loading strategies produced markedly different patterns of response in both trunk musculature and intra-abdominal pressure.