Heart, lung & circulation
-
Heart, lung & circulation · Oct 2011
ReviewIntensive glucose control and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes.
Numerous observational studies have clearly shown a relationship between hyperglycaemia and cardiovascular (CV) disease. However, the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), which involved subjects with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes, just failed to show that intensive glucose control significantly reduces CV events. The results of three subsequent large randomised controlled trials, the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD), Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) and the Veterans Administration Diabetes Trial (VADT), that involved approximately 25,000 subjects with established type 2 diabetes also failed to show that intensive glucose control, aiming for a glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) level<7%, significantly reduces CV events. ⋯ Under certain circumstances, aiming for lower HbA(1c) levels may be appropriate. This applies in the setting of newly diagnosed diabetes in relatively young individuals without significant co-morbidities and in patients treated with agents that minimise the risk of severe hypoglycaemia such as metformin. Whether this also applies to newer glucose-lowering agents that target the incretin system will depend on CV outcomes of long-term studies which are in progress.
-
Heart, lung & circulation · Oct 2011
Case ReportsChlorhexidine impregnated central venous catheter inducing an anaphylatic shock in the intensive care unit.
Chlorhexidine, a bisbiguanide, is widely used as an antiseptic agent in medical practice as it has the greatest residual antimicrobial activity. Central venous catheters coated extraluminally with chlorhexidine have been made to reduce extraluminal contamination. By using both the chlorhexidine-alchohol skin preparation and antimicrobial-coated catheters during vascular cannulation, it can reduce catheter related bloodstream significantly [1]. ⋯ Adverse reactions to chlorhexidine are rare and uncommon, and have been under-recognised as a cause of anaphylaxis. There are several reports of allergic reactions following exposure to chlorhexidine. We report of a case of anaphylaxis shock requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation during the placement of a chlorhexidine impregnated central venous catheters.