Internal medicine journal
-
Internal medicine journal · Mar 2023
LetterSociodemographic determinants of telehealth utilisation in general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia.
This analysis assessed the sociodemographic characteristics of telehealth utilisation during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic from March 2020 to August 2021 in Australia. Drawing on 860 general practice providers among 3 161 868 patients, 24 527 274 consultations were recorded. Telehealth accounted for 37.6% of the consultations, with 2.4% through videoconferencing and 35.2% through phone consultations. Our multivariate regression analyses indicated low utilisation of videoconferencing compared with phone consultations among older adults, those living in rural communities and migrants from non-English speaking countries.
-
Internal medicine journal · Mar 2023
Central venous access device practice across haematology and oncology centres in Australia and New Zealand: a cross-sectional survey.
Central venous access devices (CVADs) are commonly used in malignancies. We conducted an online, anonymous cross-sectional survey of practice regarding CVAD management in haematology centres among clinicians in Australia and New Zealand. We identified variation in clinical practice regarding CVAD selection, insertion, management and removal. These findings highlight research gaps in CVAD care.
-
Internal medicine journal · Mar 2023
Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Adult Patients with Sepsis at Risk of Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines recommend stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) for patients with sepsis who have gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding risks; however, the effect of SUP has not been specially studied in these patients. ⋯ Among critically ill, septic, adult patients at risk for GI bleeding, SUP showed no effect on hospital mortality, the rate of GI bleeding, pneumonia, CDI and ICU LOS.
-
Internal medicine journal · Mar 2023
How to reduce processing times for site-specific assessments from 29 to 5 days using a common-sense approach: it does not have to be that hard.
Researchers have reported limitations with research governance processes across Australia. This study aimed to streamline research governance processes across a local health district. Four basic principles were applied to remove non-value-adding and non-risk-mitigating processes. Average processing times were reduced from 29 to 5 days and end-user satisfaction was improved, all within the same staffing levels.