The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society
-
Clinical Trial
Incidence of simultaneous epidural and vascular injection during lumbosacral transforaminal epidural injections.
The incidence of vascular penetration during contrast confirmed fluoroscopically guided transforaminal lumbosacral epidural injections has been reported as 8.9% to 21.3% depending on the level of injection. Recently, intermittent fluoroscopy was shown to miss more than half of the vascular injections observed under live fluoroscopy. The number of misses increased when epidural and vascular contrast flow appeared simultaneously, even if the fluoroscopic image was taken during contrast injection. To date, no studies have documented the incidence of simultaneous epidural and vascular contrast injections. Also, most previous studies of vascular injections did not document use of live fluoroscopy during contrast injection, so the incidence of vascular injections may be higher than reported. ⋯ Simultaneous epidural and vascular injection is twice as likely to occur as vascular injection alone. Use of intermittent fluoroscopy can miss the transient appearance of the vascular component of these injections, giving the false impression of successful contrast placement. In light of these results, live fluoroscopy is recommended during contrast injection for confirmation of lumbosacral transforaminal epidural injections.
-
Comparative Study
The validity of manual examination in assessing patients with neck pain.
Although manual therapists believe that they can diagnose symptomatic joints in the neck by manual examination, that conviction is based on only one study. That study claimed that manual examination of the neck had 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity for diagnosing painful zygapophyseal joints. However, the study indicated that its results should be reproduced before they could be generalized. ⋯ The present study found manual examination of the cervical spine to lack validity for the diagnosis of cervical zygapophyseal joint pain. It refutes the conclusion of the one previous study. The paradoxical lack of statistical difference between the two studies is accounted for by the small sample size of the previous study.
-
There are currently a number of generic and disease-specific instruments for assessing complaints of low back pain (LBP). None provide the comprehensive coverage of the wide range of factors that are considered essential in evaluating treatment outcomes. ⋯ The LSOQ appears to be acceptable to patients, easy to administer, highly reliable, valid, and responsive. It provides information on demographics, pain severity, functional disability, psychological distress, physical symptoms, health-care utilization, and satisfaction. It should be considered for use in both clinical and research applications as well as regulatory review involving patients with LBP complaints.
-
The role of total disc arthroplasty (TDA) in the treatment of spinal pathology is unclear. TDA has been touted as an alternative to fusion. However, not all back pain is purely discogenic in origin. Contraindications to TDA exist. At Spine Week in Porto, Portugal, Cammisa's group from the Hospital for Special Surgery in New York presented a series of 56 fusions where 100% of patients had one or more of 10 contraindications to TDA. En face, this appears to be an extremely large number. ⋯ Both our study and Cammisa's indicate that all lumbar fusion patients in our two institutions have at least one contraindication to TDA. The average fusion patient does not appear to have isolated discogenic pain. A large proportion of the patients appeared to have facet arthritis. The point where facet arthrosis definitely constitutes a contradiction to TDA will require analysis during long-term arthroplasty follow-up studies. Suitable patients for TDA may not represent a significant cohort presently undergoing lumbar fusion.
-
Comparative Study
Correlation of end plate shape on MRI and disc degeneration in surgically treated patients with degenerative disc disease and herniated nucleus pulposus.
The sagittal profile of the lumbar end plates on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has not been investigated in patients with degenerative disc disease (DDD) or herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP). ⋯ The sagittal profile of end plates in the lumbar spine was described for patients with DDD on the one and HNP on the other. A higher association with symptoms was observed for flat and irregular levels in both patient groups. In DDD patients, disck degeneration on both MRI and plain radiographs increased from concave to flat, to irregular levels. In HNP patients, MRI demonstrated concave levels to be less degenerated, whereas no difference was detected between flat and irregular levels. Disc height of irregular levels was well preserved in HNP patients. Comparing the two groups of patients, flat levels were more degenerated on MRI in HNP patients. Despite similar degrees of degeneration on MRI, concave and irregular levels in DDD patients had lower disc heights. The correlation of symptoms and disc degeneration with the end plate shapes is not definitive evidence of end plate remodeling around degenerated discs. It may simply represent the higher rate of disc degeneration in the lower lumbar levels. This analysis did not provide any hints as to which degenerated discs are more likely to herniated and cause leg symptoms or cause predominantly low back pain.