The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society
-
Multicenter Study
Physical demand levels in individuals completing a sports performance-based work conditioning/hardening program after lumbar fusion.
Pain and disability after lumbar fusion surgery contributes to the over $20 billion dollars spent in health-care costs and estimated $28 billion in lost wages annually. With the goal of returning to work, an intensive program designed to build functional strength may be used. Previous interventions for this subgroup report the outcome measure of return to work (RTW), but do not account for the physical demand of the job to which they are returning. This may account for varying RTW and re-injury rates. ⋯ Post-lumbar spinal fusion patients are typically at the light PDL (<20lb occasionally) on completion of traditional physical therapy program. After an SPWC/H program, significant increase strength of deadlift and overhead lift volume and one repetition maximum demonstrated a median three-level increase in classification of PDL. We were also able to determine that there was no difference in strength outcome between those with a single- vs. multiple-level fusion surgery. Although the vast majority of individuals entered the program at the lowest PDL (20lb or less occasionally), more than 80% of patients completed the program at PDL of medium (50lb occasionally) or above, and 37% of patients achieved the maximum PDL (over 100lb occasionally). Future studies are needed to determine if increases in strength determined by PDL classification such as these relates to increased RTW rates and decreased re-injury rates.
-
Vertebral artery (VA) injury can be a catastrophic iatrogenic complication of cervical spine surgery. Although the incidence is rare, it has serious consequences including fistulas, pseudoaneurysm, cerebral ischemia, and death. It is therefore imperative to be familiar with the anatomy and the instrumentation techniques when performing anterior or posterior cervical spine surgeries. ⋯ VA injury during cervical spine surgery is a rare but serious complication. It can be prevented by careful review of preoperative imaging studies, having a sound anatomical knowledge and paying attention to surgical landmarks intraoperatively. When a VA injury occurs, prompt recognition and management are important.
-
Cervical spine fusion is performed for various indications in patient populations ranging from young and healthy to aged and frail. The choice of surgical approach is affected not only by disease pathoanatomy, but also by age, medical comorbidities, and the number of involved levels. Anterior fusion is more common for single-level pathology in relatively young, healthy patients; and posterior fusion is typically performed on older, more comorbid patients with multilevel disease. Consequently, retrospective comparisons of surgical approaches for cervical fusion will be impacted by this bias, and the optimal management of multilevel cervical spine pathology remains ambiguous with surgeon preference and experience playing a significant role in choice of procedures. ⋯ This nationwide study defines the incidence of mortality and the frequency of inpatient complications encountered during multilevel cervical fusion. The results suggest that immediate morbidity from anterior approaches is less than those undergoing posterior fusion. Prospective analysis is required to evaluate if these findings remain significant in a randomized study population. Further, these results represent only perioperative complications. However, based on the data presented herein, when confronted with the patient requiring a four-level cervical fusion, the anterior approach may offer a less risky and less costly option.
-
Disc degeneration was commonly viewed over much of the last century as a result of aging and "wear and tear" from mechanical insults and injuries. Thus, prevention strategies and research in lumbar degenerative changes and associated clinical conditions focused largely on mechanical factors as primary causes using an "injury model." The Twin Spine Study, a research program on the etiology and pathogenesis of disc degeneration, has contributed to a substantial revision of this view of determinants of lumbar disc degeneration. ⋯ The once commonly held view that disc degeneration is primarily a result of aging and "wear and tear" from mechanical insults and injuries was not supported by this series of studies. Instead, disc degeneration appears to be determined in great part by genetic influences. Although environmental factors also play a role, it is not primarily through routine physical loading exposures (eg, heavy vs. light physical demands) as once suspected.
-
Multicenter Study
Is the self-reported history accurate in patients with persistent axial pain after a motor vehicle accident?
A patient's self-reported history has, in general, assumed to be accurate. Clinical management of individuals with persistent axial pain after a motor vehicle accident (MVA) and measures to prevent future MVA, spinal cord injury, and traffic deaths often depend on a presumed accurate report of preexisting axial pain, drug, alcohol, and psychological problems to initiate intervention. In addition, research efforts to determine the effects of MVA on subsequent health are often predicated on a presumed accurate history from the patient of past medical and psychosocial problems. Despite so many clinical, public health, and research efforts being dependent on an accurate assessment of pre-injury health, the validity of the self-reported history after MVA has not been systematically investigated. ⋯ The validity of the patient's self-reported history when presenting with persistent axial pain after an MVA appears poor in this large multiclinic random sample.The self-reported rates of alcohol abuse, illicit drug use, and psychological diagnosis, as well as prior axial pain were significantly lower than that seen in the medical records, especially in thosewho perceive that the MVA was another's fault. The failure to recognize this under-reporting may seriously compromise clinical care, public health efforts at injury prevention, and research protocols dependent on accurate pre-accident morbidity assessments.