The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society
-
Comparative Study
C1 lateral mass screw placement via the posterior arch: a technique comparison and anatomic analysis.
Instrumentation of C1 is becoming increasingly common. Starting points initially described for C1 lateral mass screws at the lateral mass/posterior arch junction are technically challenging. Recently, a number of techniques have evolved advocating varying starting points and trajectories. Despite being technically easier, there are new safety concerns. Insufficient evidence exists for optimal C1 lateral mass screw placement with starting points in the posterior arch. ⋯ C1 lateral mass screws could be virtually placed bilaterally in each of 100 clinical cases without violating critical structures. However, none of the previously described approaches worked in every case because of significant anatomic variability. The vertical starting point was particularly critical, and vertebral groove height was the most limiting variable. Although a reliable safe zone could be found in every case, preoperative planning is essential to avoid critical structures.
-
Case Reports
"Artifactual fracture-subluxation" of cervical spine in computed tomography screening sans plain radiographs.
Computed tomography (CT) has become the sole modality of screening for cervical injury in polytrauma because of the high sensitivity, speed, and convenience, thereby eliminating the need for plain radiographs. ⋯ Motion artifact in cervical CT screening can lead to a misdiagnosis of fracture subluxation. Duplication of soft tissue is highly suggestive of this motion artifact, and an additional single lateral plain radiograph may avert this pitfall.
-
After decades of clinical research, the role of surgery for chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) remains equivocal. Despite significant intellectual, human, and economic investments into randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the past two decades, the role of surgery in the treatment for CNLBP has not been clarified. ⋯ The research agenda of RCTs for surgery of CNLBP has not changed substantially in the last 20 years. Technical trials evaluating nuances of surgical techniques significantly predominate. Despite the publication of four RCTs reporting equivocal benefits of surgery for CNLBP between 2001 and 2006, there was no change in the research agenda of subsequent RCTs, and technical trials continued to outnumber indication trials. Rather than clarifying what, if any, indications for surgery exist, investigators in the field continue to analyze variations in surgical technique, which will probably have relatively little impact on patient outcomes. As a result, clinicians unfortunately have little evidence to advise patients regarding surgical intervention for CNLBP.
-
Observational Study
One-year outcomes of surgical versus nonsurgical treatments for discogenic back pain: a community-based prospective cohort study.
The clinical entity "discogenic back pain" remains controversial at fundamental levels, including its pathophysiology, diagnostic criteria, and optimal treatment. This is true despite availability of four randomized trials comparing the efficacy of surgical and nonsurgical treatments. One trial showed benefit for lumbar fusion compared with unstructured nonoperative care, and three others showed roughly similar results for lumbar surgery and structured rehabilitation. ⋯ The surgical group showed greater improvement at 1 year compared with the nonsurgical group, although the composite success rate for both treatment groups was only fair. The results should be interpreted cautiously because outcomes are short term, and treatment was not randomly assigned. Only 5% of nonsurgical patients received cognitive behavior therapy. Nonsurgical treatment that patients received was variable and mostly not compliant with major guidelines.
-
Intervertebral disc and facet joints are the two primary load-bearing structures of the lumbar spine, and altered loading to these structures may be associated with frontal plane spinal deviations. ⋯ Facet loading increased during simulated pelvic obliquity in frontal and transverse planes, whereas intradiscal pressures were decreased compared with sagittal and frontal plane motions alone. Altered spinopelvic alignment may increase the loads experienced by spinal tissue, especially the facet joints.