Articles: videolaryngoscope
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Postoperative laryngeal morbidity and intubating conditions using the McGRATH™ MAC videolaryngoscope with or without neuromuscular blockade: a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.
Tracheal intubation without neuromuscular blockade may be associated with worse intubating conditions and increased laryngeal morbidity. We hypothesised that tracheal intubation using the McGRATH™ MAC videolaryngoscope would not increase postoperative hoarseness, even without neuromuscular blockade. In this prospective, randomised, parallel-group, double-blind, non-inferiority trial, 248 patients were randomly assigned to tracheal intubation with or without neuromuscular blockade using rocuronium. ⋯ Also, no significant differences were found between the two groups for hoarseness at 24 h (22.8% vs. 27.1%) or for sore throat at 24 h (12.2% vs. 9.3%) and 48 h postoperatively (1.6% vs. 0.8%). Although more patients in the non-paralysed group showed an adducted position of the vocal cords (29.3% vs. 0%), there were no significant group differences in the ease of laryngoscopy (96.7% vs. 98.3%), Cormack grade laryngeal view 1 (97.6% vs. 96.6%) or first-pass success rate (100% vs. 100%). We conclude that when using the McGRATH MAC videolaryngoscope for tracheal intubation, the incidence of postoperative hoarseness was not inferior if neuromuscular blockade was avoided.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
A randomised clinical trial comparing the 'sniffing' and neutral position using channelled (KingVision® ) and non-channelled (C-MAC® ) videolaryngoscopes.
Head and neck position is one of the factors which can be associated with difficult videolaryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. This prospective randomised clinical trial compared 'sniffing' and neutral positions using a channelled (KingVision® ) and a non-channelled (C-MAC® D-blade) videolaryngoscope in 200 adult patients randomly allocated into four groups (KingVision 'sniffing', KingVision neutral, C-MAC 'sniffing' and C-MAC neutral). The primary outcome was the ease of tracheal intubation using the modified intubation difficulty scale (mIDS) score. ⋯ The percentage of glottic opening score was lower for C-MAC neutral group as compared with other three groups (p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the ease of intubation between the 'sniffing' and the neutral position when using the KingVision and the C-MAC videolaryngoscopes. Therefore, either of the two positions could be used with these types of videolaryngoscopes, if deemed advantageous for the patient.
-
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol · Jul 2018
Ease of intubation and hemodynamic responses to nasotracheal intubation using C-MAC videolaryngoscope with D blade: A comparison with use of traditional Macintosh laryngoscope.
Nasal intubation with traditional Macintosh laryngoscope usually needs the use of Magill's forceps or external laryngeal manipulation. The primary objective of this study was to assess the ease of intubation during C-MAC videolaryngoscope-assisted nasal intubation using D blade and to compare it with traditional Macintosh laryngoscope-aided nasal intubation. The secondary objectives were comparison of intubation time, attempts, trauma, and hemodynamic stress responses. ⋯ C MAC videolaryngoscope-aided nasotracheal intubation using D blade is superior in view of easier, quicker, and less traumatic intubation compared to the use of traditional Macintosh laryngoscope.