Articles: analgesics.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 2025
Meta AnalysisOpioid-Sparing Anesthesia Versus Opioid-Free Anesthesia for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting after Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Patients who undergo laparoscopic bariatric surgery (LBS) are susceptible to postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) or opioid-sparing anesthesia (OSA) protocols have been proposed as solutions; however, differences between the 2 alternative opioid protocols for anesthesia maintenance in obese patients remain uncertain. A network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the impacts of OFA and OSA on PONV. ⋯ OFA is more effective than OSA in reducing the occurrence of PONV during the early postoperative period of LBS, although it may associate with an increased risk of bradycardia. Patients who received either opioid-alternative strategy demonstrated similar effects in reducing postoperative opioid consumption and alleviating pain intensity.
-
Editorial Review
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the perioperative period: current controversies and concerns.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-specific inhibitors provide significant analgesic and opioid-sparing benefits. However, these analgesics are commonly avoided owing to concerns of potential adverse effects. The evidence for NSAID-related adverse effects is conflicting and of poor quality, and these analgesics are safer than what has been implied. Thus, it is imperative that NSAIDs or COX-2-specific inhibitors are administered routinely unless there are well-founded contraindications.
-
Pain is a common presenting symptom to consultant physicians, both in the hospital and in the clinic or rooms. Biologically, pain serves as warning of tissue damage. But this is no longer the case when pain is present for months or years, especially when it has been fully investigated. ⋯ The response to the so-called 'opioid epidemic' has led to a renewed focus on how chronic pain should be managed. The aim of this article is to update fellows and trainees on the assessment and management of chronic pain in adult medical patients. In particular, we address the role of pharmacotherapy post-opioid epidemic (primarily antidepressants and anticonvulsants in neuropathic pain), the place of interventional procedures and the nature and effectiveness of pain self-management training in people with chronic pain, many of whom have had pain for a year or more and failed other treatments.
-
Chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is a leading driver of disability. Primary care clinicians treat most patients with CNCP. Yet, they are often unable to identify appropriate pain treatments, mainly due to concerns about the safety and effectiveness of available medications. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) can be useful tools to guide primary care clinicians in selecting pain treatments based on the best available evidence. ⋯ Most CPGs focused on opioid management, with contradictory recommendations for non-opioid management based on low-quality evidence. Additional research is needed to strengthen the evidence for using non-opioid and non-pharmacological interventions to manage patients with CNCP.
-
Review
Persistent pain, long-term opioids, and restoring trust in the patient-clinician relationship.
The erosion of trust in the patient-clinician relationship is an underappreciated, and vital, component of the prescription opioid crisis. Drawing from lived experience of patients and clinicians, and a narrative evidence review, this report discusses how opioid use for persistent pain can impact the patient-clinician relationship from the vantage points of the patient and the family physician. For patients, the stress of dealing with persistent pain, misalignment with clinicians regarding goals of care, experiences of disrespect and stigma, fear of abrupt tapers, and frustration with a fragmented health system, all combine to breed a lack of trust. ⋯ To support implementation of evidence-based guidelines and achieve public health goals of safer prescribing and reducing harm from prescription opioids, we recommend steps health systems and clinicians can take to rebuild trust in the patient-clinician relationship, enable patient-centered pain care, and embed patient perspectives into opioid safety processes. PERSPECTIVE: Erosion of patient-clinician trust is a barrier to implementing evidence-based guidelines that aim to improve opioid safety. This paper explores lived patient and clinician experiences and recommends steps for health systems and clinicians to rebuild this trust as a strategy to actualize the benefits of adherence to these guidelines.