Articles: analgesics.
-
Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
Morphine and ibuprofen compared using the cold pressor test.
The analgesic efficacy of single doses of oral morphine sulphate solution (10 mg) and ibuprofen 600 mg was compared in 12 volunteers using a double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled design on the cold pressor experimental pain model. Measurement of pain intensity was made before medication and then at 30, 60, 90, 120 and 180 min; blood samples were taken at these times for measurement of morphine and glucuronide metabolites by radioimmunoassay. Sessions were at least 5 days apart. ⋯ Ibuprofen was statistically indistinguishable from placebo on all three measures of analgesia. Analgesic effect and plasma concentrations of morphine showed significant correlation (P = 0.053). The study confirmed reports of the opiate sensitivity of the cold pressor model, and the apparent insensitivity of the model to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Analgesic and respiratory effects of epidural sufentanil in patients following thoracotomy.
Immediately following thoracotomy, 22 patients were entered into a randomized, double blind study comparing the effects of three lumbar epidural doses of sufentanil on postoperative pain and respiratory pattern. Patients were given either 30 micrograms (group I), 50 micrograms (group II), or 75 micrograms (group III) of epidural sufentanil in 20 ml N saline. Repeat doses were given on request for the 24-h study period. ⋯ Analgesia was not significantly prolonged by increasing the dose of sufentanil. SRR occurred in all four groups (group I: 2/9; group II: 2/6; group III: 7/7; group IV: 2/10 P less than 0.05 I, IV:II, I, IV:III, II:III). The number of episodes of SRR/hr was highest in group II (group I: 0.6 +/- 0.8, group II: 4.12 +/- 0.6, group III: 1.8 +/- 2.0, group IV: 0.5 +/- 0.2) (NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Low-dose sufentanil as a supplement to halothane/N2O anaesthesia in infants and children.
Sufentanil as a supplement to halothane/N2O anaesthesia was evaluated in 32 unpremedicated infants and children age 6 months to 9 yr undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery. Patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to receive one of four intravenous supplements: placebo, sufentanil 0.5, 1.0 or 1.5 micrograms.kg-1. Systolic arterial pressure (SAP), heart rate (HR) and end-tidal halothane concentration were recorded before and after induction, supplement administration, tracheal intubation, incision and every 15 min during the procedure. ⋯ One patient in the sufentanil 1.0 micrograms.kg-1 group whose surgical time was less than 45 min exhibited respiratory depression in the PACU requiring narcotic reversal. In conclusion, sufentanil 0.5 micrograms.kg-1 improved immediate postoperative pain relief and is acceptable as a supplement during halothane anasethesia in infants and children. The associated side effects of larger doses of sufentanil (1.0 and 1.5 micrograms.kg-1) make their use as a supplement to halothane anaesthesia unacceptable.
-
Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. · Jun 1988
Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical TrialAnalgesic effect of picenadol, codeine, and placebo in patients with postoperative pain.
A double-blind, parallel study was conducted to evaluate the analgesic effect and safety of a single 25 mg oral dose of picenadol, a centrally acting analgesic, and to compare it with a 60 mg dose of codeine and a placebo in patients with postoperative pain. Two sites using similar protocols enrolled a total of 178 inpatients with postoperative pain. ⋯ Both picenadol and codeine were significantly more effective than placebo in reducing pain intensity (mean sum of pain intensity difference scores: picenadol 5.21, codeine 5.19, and placebo 2.82) and increasing total relief (mean total pain relief: picenadol 10.21, codeine 11.07, and placebo 6.96). Adverse experience profiles were similar among the three treatment groups.