Articles: analgesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1995
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComputer-controlled infusion of alfentanil versus patient-controlled administration of morphine for postoperative analgesia: a double-blind randomized trial.
This study compared the efficacy of computer-controlled infusion of alfentanil (CCiA) with patient-controlled administration of morphine (PCAM) for postoperative analgesia. Twenty patients were randomly allocated to one of the two study groups to receive either an intravenous CCiA or PCAM regimen. Pain scores measured on a visual analog scale (VAS) and the number of valid demands were used as variables to evaluate the efficacy of the postoperative analgesic therapy. ⋯ The MDPE and MDAPE were 8% and 22%, respectively. The maximum alfentanil concentrations associated with pain and the minimum effective analgesic concentrations of alfentanil varied considerably both inter- and intraindividually. In conclusion, compared to a standard intravenous PCAM regimen, a CCiA is faster in onset of analgesia and is as effective in providing postoperative analgesia.
-
J Pain Symptom Manage · Oct 1995
Clinical TrialLong-term intraspinal infusions of opioids in the treatment of neuropathic pain.
Long-term intraspinal infusions of opioid drugs are being increasingly utilized in patients with noncancer pain. Despite this, there is a lack of long-term information, including success and failure rates for pain relief and technical problems. During a 5-year period, 18 noncancer patients underwent implantation of programmable infusion pumps for long-term intrathecal opioid infusion. ⋯ Failure of long-term pain relief occurred in 39% (7/18) despite good pain relief in trial infusions and the use of both morphine and sufentanil. Technical problems developed in 6/18 patients but appeared to be preventable with further experience. Long-term intrathecal opioid infusions can be effective in treatment of neuropathic pain but might require higher infusion doses.
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Oct 1995
Comparison of continuous spinal and epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour.
We have compared continuous spinal analgesia with continuous epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour. Twenty-six women were randomly allocated to receive either epidural 0.25% bupivacaine 5-10 ml via a 20 gauge catheter inserted through a 16 gauge Tuohy needle or intrathecal 0.25% bupivacaine 0.5-1.0 ml via a 32 gauge catheter inserted through a 24 gauge Sprotte needle. This was supplemented with fentanyl 5-10 mcg (spinal) or 1 mcg per kg (epidural) if analgesia was unsatisfactory. ⋯ Pain relief was satisfactory in all patients and none had post-dural puncture headache. Continuous spinal analgesia may offer significant advantages over epidural analgesia but technical difficulties remain with the present equipment. The reasons for the withdrawal of the spinal catheters in the United States of America are discussed.
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Oct 1995
Post partum magnetic resonance imaging: lumbar tissue changes are unrelated to epidural analgesia or mode of delivery.
Thirty five women consented post partum to daily lumbar back pain assessments and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (0.15 Tesla) within 48 hours of delivery using a T(1) weighted spin echo and a fat suppression sequence (STIR) to identify tissue water. Nine women (26%) had lumbar disc abnormalities on MRI scan. ⋯ Eight women (23%) had mild, 15 (43%) moderate, and 12 (34%) severe changes with an average of 5 segments involved. These changes were reversible and related neither to the mode of delivery, nor to the trauma of epidural cannulation.