Articles: analgesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparison of droperidol and cyclizine in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting associated with patient-controlled analgesia.
Fifty ASA 1 or 2 patients scheduled to undergo major gynaecological surgery were allocated randomly to one of two groups. All patients received a standard anaesthetic regimen. Patients in group 1 received droperidol 1.25 mg given intravenously 20 min prior to the end of surgery and a patient-controlled analgesia infusion containing morphine 1 mg.ml-1 and droperidol 0.05 mg.ml-1. ⋯ Fifteen of 25 patients (60%) in group 1 and 18 (72%) of 25 in group 2 suffered no nausea or vomiting postoperatively. Two patients (8%) in group 1 and three (12%) in group 2 suffered severe postoperative nausea or vomiting. We conclude that cyclizine is as effective as droperidol in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting when included in a patient-controlled analgesia infusion using morphine.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Analgesia after inguinal herniorrhaphy with laparoscopic inspection of the peritoneum in children. Caudal block versus ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric block.
The authors prospectively evaluated the efficacy of caudal epidural block versus local infiltration combined with ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric block for analgesia after inguinal herniorrhaphy with laparoscopic inspection of the peritoneum. During standardized anesthetic care, 24 children were randomized to Group I (caudal epidural block with 1.2 mL/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine) or to Group II (local infiltration with an ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric block). Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower at all four evaluation points in Group I than in Group II. ⋯ Time to extubation was 3.8 +/- 0.5 minutes in Group I and 8.2 +/- 1.1 minutes in Group II. The time from arrival in the postanesthesia care unit until discharge home was 113 +/- 3 minutes in Group I and 152 +/- 11 minutes in Group II. Caudal epidural block was more effective than local infiltration in controlling pain after herniorrhaphy with laparoscopy in children and resulted in earlier discharge home.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 1995
Comparative StudyThe effects of differing concentrations of bupivacaine on the epidural somatosensory evoked potential after posterior tibial nerve stimulation.
The somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) recorded from the cervical epidural space in response to stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve is often used to monitor spinal cord integrity during scoliosis surgery. Epidural analgesia may be used as part of the anesthetic technique for scoliosis surgery, but the effects of the local analgesic on the evoked potential must be determined to ensure that it does not interfere with the monitoring of spinal cord function. Therefore, we compared the effects of the administration of 10 mL of 0.25% (n = 8), 0.5% (n = 8), or 0.75% (n = 8) bupivacaine injected into the L3-4 epidural space on the somatosensory evoked potential to posterior tibial nerve stimulation in patients anesthetized with a propofol infusion, nitrous oxide and oxygen, immediately before scoliosis surgery. ⋯ There were no significant differences between 0.25% bupivacaine and the control group, but both 0.5% and 0.75% bupivacaine were associated with clinically and statistically significant decreases in overall amplitude (P < 0.002, 0.5% bupivacaine; P < 0.001, 0.75% bupivacaine). Latency increased similarly in all groups. We conclude that bupivacaine in concentrations greater than 0.25% is not suitable for scoliosis surgery, if spinal somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) are to be measured.
-
The change of analgesic levels, plasma concentrations and the radiographical changes of epidural space due to continuous epidural block were studied in 54 patients receiving pain relief. All the patients received 2 ml per hour of 2% lidocaine or 0.5% bupivacaine via the catheter over two weeks. The effect of epidural block was determined on 1, 2, 4, 7, 10 and 14 days, the epidurogram was performed on 1, 7, 14 days, and plasma concentration of lidocaine or bupivacaine was measured on 1, 3, 7, 14 days. ⋯ The effects and plasma concentrations of epidural block decreased significantly after a week, and the mean segmental number of radiographic spread decreased significantly after two weeks. The decreasing effect or duration of epidural block was due to decrease in spread of anesthetics because of adhesion around the catheter in the epidural space. We conclude that the safety period of continuous epidural block is within 2 weeks.
-
Letter Case Reports
Epidural clonidine for relief from intractable labour pain.