Articles: analgesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Sep 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialEffect of topical eutectic mixture of local anesthetics on pain response and analgesic requirement during lithotripsy procedures.
We sought to determine whether topically applied eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) would decrease analgesic requirement during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Fifty-nine healthy out-patients undergoing elective ESWL using an unmodified Dornier HM-3 lithotriptor were randomly assigned to receive either a topical EMLA or placebo cream applied to the skin of the flank overlying the kidney 90 min prior to the ESWL procedure. Patients were given five test shocks at each of five different energy levels: 10, 12, 15, 18, and 20 kV. ⋯ EMLA cream was significantly more effective at decreasing cutaneous pain in male than in female patients. However, during the lithotripsy procedure, EMLA cream had no significant effect on the intraoperative requirement for intravenous alfentanil, hemodynamic variables, recovery times, or postoperative side effects. Although the topical application of EMLA cream produced cutaneous analgesia, these data suggest that it failed to produce any opioid-sparing effect during the immersion lithotripsy procedure.
-
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim · Sep 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Influence of anesthetic technique in postoperative analgesia in thoracic surgery].
To compare the intensity of postoperative pain after thoracotomy with 2 anesthetic techniques: 1) thoracic epidural block with bupivacaine administered before surgery (combined anesthesia with isoflurane) and 2) conventional balanced anesthesia with isoflurane and endovenous fentanyl. ⋯ Analgesic efficacy after thoracotomy was similar for our 2 groups receiving either combined anesthesia (epidural bupivacaine at 0.5% and isoflurane) or balanced anesthesia with isoflurane and endovenous fentanyl.
-
Journal of anesthesia · Sep 1994
A comparative study of the efficacy of postoperative analgesia with intraoperative epidural lidocaine with or without morphine.
We compared postoperative analgesia in 15 patients (group A) who were given intraoperative epidural morphine 3 mg and lidocaine 150 mg after laminectomy/discectomy with that of 15 patients (group B) who were given only epidural lidocaine 150 mg. Epidural administration was accomplished by direct placement of the epidural catheter into the epidural space under direct vision during surgery. ⋯ There was no difference in the observed side effects in the two groups. We conclude that postoperative pain relief following laminectomy/discectomy is superior when epidural morphine is added to lidocaine than when lidocaine is being used alone.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Ondansetron does not inhibit the analgesic effect of alfentanil.
5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) causes antinociception via presynaptic 5-HT3 (5-HT subtype 3) receptors on primary afferent nociceptive neurones in the spinal cord dorsal horn. Therefore, ondansetron (a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist) may increase the perception of a noxious stimulus or decrease the effects of concurrently administered antinociceptive drugs. Using a randomized, double-blind, crossover study design, we have tested this hypothesis in eight healthy volunteers who, on three different days, received either ondansetron and placebo, ondansetron and alfentanil or placebo and alfentanil. ⋯ Ondansetron alone did not change the response to any of the experimental tests, but alfentanil and the combination ondansetron-alfentanil significantly changed the response compared with ondansetron alone. There was no difference between alfentanil alone and the combination ondansetron-alfentanil. We conclude that ondansetron does not change the response to pressure, heat, cold or electrical nociceptive stimuli or antagonize the analgesic effect of alfentanil.